Talk about the proof being in the pudding. That's a pretty strong trend.
If we want to be 100% factual, then we would have to look at all of their stats to determine what exactly is responsible for their decline. No pudding yet... just some scattered ingredients.
If we want to be 100% factual, then we would have to look at all of their stats to determine what exactly is responsible for their decline. No pudding yet... just some scattered ingredients.
Yes, but it works the other way as well. So far that camp blames personal and "other" things for declines but is quick to claim them when they win, although someone like Axley was number one in putting the week of the Texas Open or whatever he won.