quote:Originally posted by Mathew
Its the sequence unloading of the accumulators(hands and arms).... this should be unchanged but may overlap (merge in otherwords)...
Don't believe it matters if your swinging or hitting...
The Four Barrel Stroke is for Hitters only. Three Barrel is the maximum for Swingers. The sequence always begins with #4 -- nothing can happen until the Left Arm moves. Then #1, #2, #3 for Hitters. Swingers omit #1 because Centrifugal Force drives the Club, not Muscular Thrust. So, their remaining sequence is #2, #3.quote:Originally posted by Triad
quote:Originally posted by Mathew
Its the sequence unloading of the accumulators(hands and arms).... this should be unchanged but may overlap (merge in otherwords)...
Don't believe it matters if your swinging or hitting...
For Swingers, the recommended application is 4,2,3 in sequential order. Accumulator #1, the Muscle Power of the driving right forearm, is typicaly passive in the Swingers stroke.
Hitters might typicaly use 1,2,3 simultaneously but do not generaly use the gyroscopic Body power of the #4.
I guess this might be a good opportunity to begin our discussion of whether it is possible or advisable to have a True 4 Barrel sroke![]()
quote:Originally posted by drewitgolf
Check your numbers.
The release sequence related to Power Accumulators, there stroke variation and pressure point combination.
1. The driving power of the right forearm.
2. The proper uncocking of the left wrist.
3. The synchronized roll of the left wrist through Impact.
4. The blasting of the left arm off the chest with the body pivot.
For uncompensated strokes:
Swingers 4-2-3
Hitters 1-2-3
Increase overlap to increase thrust. Decrease overlap to increase velocity.
quote:Originally posted by Triad
Master,
Have you now changed your earlier position that the 4 Barrel stroke is unattainable/inadvisable but reserved this option solely for the more 'sophisticated' motion of the Hitter?
Triad
quote:Originally posted by holenone
quote:Originally posted by Triad
Master,
Have you now changed your earlier position that the 4 Barrel stroke is unattainable/inadvisable but reserved this option solely for the more 'sophisticated' motion of the Hitter?
Triad
I have always recommended the Four Barrel Stroke for Full Power -- but only for Hitters. Any post you saw recommending a Three Barrel maximum applied only to Swingers. There were many posts on other sites earlier this year -- almost all relating to the Theoretical Four Accumulator 'Maximum Participation' Stroke Pattern in TGM's Third Edition. In those sequenced posts, qualifiers as to the Swinger/Hitter distinction almost certainly were omitted.
If you want a Four Barrel Swing, fine. In Homer's words, "Fly at it." But...here's the true TGM bottom Line:
Hitter -- Four Barrel Maximum.
Swinger -- Three Barrel Maximum.
Like it or not, this was Homer Kelley's stated (and recorded) position.
In a nutshell:
The Hitter's Bent Right Arm is driven by Muscular Thrust and Pushes the Club through Impact. The Swinger's essentially inert Left Arm is Driven by Centrifugal Force and Pulls the Club through Impact. You cannot Push the Club through Impact with Right Arm Muscular Thrust and Pull the Club through Impact with Left Arm Centrifugal Force at the same time.
Over time, Homer came to see that very clearly, and he was adamant in his denunciation of the Four Barrel Swing. He was equally adamant in his recommendation of the Four Barrel Hit, providing the Right Shoulder was used properly (as discussed in my prior post).
For me, having been down this road before, this is 'end of story.' I refuse to debate it further, on this site or anywhere else. So, 'have at it' if you will, but I'll watch from the grandstand.
This is an incredibly important post, and I sincerely -- and without ego -- hope you guys appreciate it.
Meanwhile...
Pass the peanuts and crackerjacks, please.
[8D]
quote:Originally posted by Triad
To utilize the full power of the four barrel Hitting stroke, which (if any) of the components in the basic Hitting pattern (12-1-0)need to be altered.
I am thinking, probably number 11 (Pressure Points) but possibly number 10 (Hinge Action), number 19 (Lag Loading) but probably not number 20 (Trigger Type).
Regards,
Triad
quote:Nevertheless, once the 'customizing stage' is reached, he felt that it is more advantageous for the Hitter (with his 'carry back' Motion and Loading) to start from the Impact position (10-9-B). That way, the Impact Alignments never change. He did not feel that way for the Swinger, whose 'Swing Back' Motion and Loading benefits from the Standard Address conditions.
quote:Originally posted by brianman
So, Lynn would my pattern be four-barrel?
quote:Originally posted by armourall
quote:Nevertheless, once the 'customizing stage' is reached, he felt that it is more advantageous for the Hitter (with his 'carry back' Motion and Loading) to start from the Impact position (10-9-B). That way, the Impact Alignments never change. He did not feel that way for the Swinger, whose 'Swing Back' Motion and Loading benefits from the Standard Address conditions.
Holenone,
We've previously discussed Larry Nelson's Address positioning (with his Impact Hands, but without the Right Forearm on Plane or Hips Shifted and Turned). How far would Mr. Kelley want us to go with the suggested Impact Address? Is it simply Impact Hands, or should we go all the way with it?
[?]
quote:Originally posted by holenone
quote:Originally posted by armourall
quote:Nevertheless, once the 'customizing stage' is reached, he felt that it is more advantageous for the Hitter (with his 'carry back' Motion and Loading) to start from the Impact position (10-9-B). That way, the Impact Alignments never change. He did not feel that way for the Swinger, whose 'Swing Back' Motion and Loading benefits from the Standard Address conditions.
Holenone,
We've previously discussed Larry Nelson's Address positioning (with his Impact Hands, but without the Right Forearm on Plane or Hips Shifted and Turned). How far would Mr. Kelley want us to go with the suggested Impact Address? Is it simply Impact Hands, or should we go all the way with it?
[?]
I go 'all the way' with it, Armourall. Just be careful not to exaggerate the Body Position. Comparatively Squared Away is all you need.
My personal keys are:
1. My Lowered, Centered and Stationary Head positon;
2. My Anchored Knees and Feet (usually a bit heavier on the Left than on the Right);
3. My Left and Right Wrist Alignments;
4. The Feel of the Pressure Points in my Hands, especially #1 in Hitting and #2 in Swinging and the always 'easy' Right Forefinger #3;
5. The #1 and #3 Pressure Points facing down the Angle of Approach, not toward the Target;
6. My Right Forearm (and Elbow) On Plane and pointing at the Plane Line on its own Angle of Approach;
7. My raised Left Shoulder and lowered Right Shoulder that gives me 'plenty of Bent Right Arm' to Drive through the Ball.
8. In a nutshell, my Head and my Anchors and the overall 'set' of my Flying Wedges Assembly.
Writing this out, it seems like a lot. But it's not, really. Remember, I've worked on each of these things individually over a long period of time. So, it's not so much a matter of me doing something as it is a matter of the warning light flashing red if I don't do it!
I know this:
At Address, it is not unusual for me to have the distinct sensation -- particularly given the Pressures established in my Hands and the Feel of my On Plane Right Forearm -- that I have already hit the Ball!
quote:Originally posted by efnef
Here is the key and where many amateurs get crossed up. In Swinging, the right arm is inactively thrusting, it is inert. In Hitting the right arm actively thrusting. If you are Swinging the right arm should NOT be the focal point. If it is, then you are moving from a Swinging Procedure to a Hitting Procedure. What is the significance? The more you mix Hitting and Swinging Components, the more your game will suffer. Can you get away with it? Yes. But, you will suffer inconsistencies. This is why one must decide from the get go, "Am I going to Hit or Swing?"