Reading sections 6-N/P/R-0 on non-automatic and automatic Releases uncovers some of Homer's raw genius.
He states that for non-automatic Release, the individual Stroke Patterns should be practiced individually step by step until they are consciously perfected. This of course is classic Motor Control Learning Theory relating to whole v.s. part practice. Due to the complexity of Release, Homer felt that it should be learned and practiced by parts and then assembled into it's whole after the parts have been mastered.
In section 3-A, Homer speaks to Translation of Instruction and correct application of TGM. "A procedure must make sense - geometrically and technically." ... for correct application.
Given the complexity of TGM, how can one know that one has properly mastered the Component Parts of the non-automatic Release before attempting the Automatic Release?
How do you, as an AI, judge that somebody has sufficiently mastered the parts of the non-automatic Release before attempting an Automatic Release?
He states that for non-automatic Release, the individual Stroke Patterns should be practiced individually step by step until they are consciously perfected. This of course is classic Motor Control Learning Theory relating to whole v.s. part practice. Due to the complexity of Release, Homer felt that it should be learned and practiced by parts and then assembled into it's whole after the parts have been mastered.
In section 3-A, Homer speaks to Translation of Instruction and correct application of TGM. "A procedure must make sense - geometrically and technically." ... for correct application.
Given the complexity of TGM, how can one know that one has properly mastered the Component Parts of the non-automatic Release before attempting the Automatic Release?
How do you, as an AI, judge that somebody has sufficiently mastered the parts of the non-automatic Release before attempting an Automatic Release?