Brian: NEXT PROJECTAnalysis Hogan vs. Lee Buck?

Status
Not open for further replies.

rundmc

Banned
Brian,

Thanks for more than expert commentary and analysis of the Hawk. I vote that your next one be a comparison of the Hawk and Lee Buck. Lee actually dedicated his book to Hogan. But who would have guessed that's who he got it from? Here are two dudes considered the number 1 or 2 ballstriker ever with very much in common but very different. And also viewed very differently from a mechanical perspective. One gets dissed and the other is idolized by pop instruction.

Both were tough asses but one never talked and the other wouldn't shut up.

Both practiced until their fingers bled and couldn't putt but one is idolized and the other is just "merry mex."

Both had tough times: Car wreck, dad off'ed himself, failed marriages and fatherhoods.

Sometimes they were a-holes and other times very generous.

Both "got it" from the dirt and learned to eliminate the left side, but one's swing is considered textbook but the other is considered a science project goof-up that just got lucky.

Both had the arched left wrist, but their right arms worked differently.

One faded it "shut." The other faded it "open."

One grip was turned. The other grip was rolled.

One said he spinned. The other said he slid. But they both slid.

One played Square-Open the other played Square-Closed.

Both hit it low. But one was heralded for his long iron play. And the other for short iron play.

The one who swung said he hit with 3 right hands. The one who hit said he pulled hard with the left hand.

How about it man? Let's give Lee Buck a the love he rightfully deserves! He's the model for your logo and what better teach than B Manzella to make this happen?

I think this would be a heck'uva fog buster for us all.
 

rundmc

Banned
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

One had great power, the other a clubhead so slow a bird could have nested on it.

And both won multiple majors and neither one flipped the bird.

MJ . . . Start the poo poo party on Lee Buck's move. I think this will be an interesting discourse.
 
Trevino was a GREAT ball striker. However...

Mid 80s on #8 at Southern Hills - 230 yd par 3 - everyone else is hitting long irons - T pulls a 3 wood, sets up, then backs off and walking back toward the bag says "gimme the driver Herman, no way I can get there with this."
 

jeffy

Banned
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

Trevino was a GREAT ball striker. However...

Mid 80s on #8 at Southern Hills - 230 yd par 3 - everyone else is hitting long irons - T pulls a 3 wood, sets up, then backs off and walking back toward the bag says "gimme the driver Herman, no way I can get there with this."

How many hitting irons were in their mid-40's, had a bad back and had been struck by lightning? Jerry Heard would probably also have needed driver...
 

rundmc

Banned
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

Trevino was a GREAT ball striker. However...

Mid 80s on #8 at Southern Hills - 230 yd par 3 - everyone else is hitting long irons - T pulls a 3 wood, sets up, then backs off and walking back toward the bag says "gimme the driver Herman, no way I can get there with this."

Moe Norman wasn't long either. Most of the dudes on tour say he is best without debate. Questions: 1. Who do you consider the top 3 ballstrikers? 2. I would assume that you would say Hogan was a better ballstriker than Lee Buck. If so, how much better and why?

There are quite a few quotes out there from the old set on tour that say Lee Buck could hit it better than Hogan. Heck if I know. But there's more than one way to skin a cat.
 

hue

New
I read somewhere that Trevino was measured as the most accurate ball striker with a 5% error. Most tour players are betweem 7% and 9%. Tom Weiskopf was close. Hogan was not tested on this percentage basis as his career was over but was considered to be as accurate as Trevino.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top