Looking for comments (pro & con) on my 'theory' of Clubface Closing Rate.
My goal (valid or not) is to reach a point in the downswing where the clubshaft is parallel to the plane line, parallel to the ground, and clubface is vertical (toe up - this would be slightly "closed" to the plane as it does not lie on the plane). At this point my hips would be 'square', weight centered (or slightly left), right shoulder back and down(hopefully on plane).
From this point, I would want the clubface to 'close' at the same rate as the club moves down and out (i.e. for every degree the club moves, the clubface would 'close' the same degree). At impact, the clubface would be slightly 'open' as the shaft has not yet moved 90 degree (forward shaft lean), but close to 'square' at separation (as shaft reaches vertical).
This would seem to provide a very stable clubface (no quick or violent change in clubface position).
The majority of the 'closing' is accomplised by the turning of the torso (hips if you will). The remainder is subtle rotation of the left arm (not a concious (sp) effort).
Past separation, the clubface would continue to close at the same rate (degree for degree) until approx. waist high - then 'swivel' would take it to the finish.
I would rate this as more of an angled hinge than a horizontal hinge.
All comments welcome.
Thanks - Bruce
My goal (valid or not) is to reach a point in the downswing where the clubshaft is parallel to the plane line, parallel to the ground, and clubface is vertical (toe up - this would be slightly "closed" to the plane as it does not lie on the plane). At this point my hips would be 'square', weight centered (or slightly left), right shoulder back and down(hopefully on plane).
From this point, I would want the clubface to 'close' at the same rate as the club moves down and out (i.e. for every degree the club moves, the clubface would 'close' the same degree). At impact, the clubface would be slightly 'open' as the shaft has not yet moved 90 degree (forward shaft lean), but close to 'square' at separation (as shaft reaches vertical).
This would seem to provide a very stable clubface (no quick or violent change in clubface position).
The majority of the 'closing' is accomplised by the turning of the torso (hips if you will). The remainder is subtle rotation of the left arm (not a concious (sp) effort).
Past separation, the clubface would continue to close at the same rate (degree for degree) until approx. waist high - then 'swivel' would take it to the finish.
I would rate this as more of an angled hinge than a horizontal hinge.
All comments welcome.
Thanks - Bruce