You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Croker
- Thread starter curtisj76
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I've known Peter for over 10 years. He is heavily influenced by TGM and he worked very hard to build his system for people shaped golfers (his dream). Another of the prerequisits was a body friendly swing.curtisj76 said:I hear different names come up from time to time - Manzella, Evans, Blake. What about Croker? Does he teach the same way?
I believe he was offered a GSED by Mrs. Kelley for his work concerning CGS. I think he may have been too shy to accept or felt that he may not have deserved it, you'd have to ask him.
He received his GSEM from Tom Tomasello who greatly influenced Peter. I beleive it has been said before that Homer's TGM is not a method but a system that can be used to describe and create different ways to move the golf club and golf ball. I think Peter used this information as a road map of the highest level.
Peter emailed me the other day to say that he and Brian will be meeting on July 2nd which I know will be awesome! Fly on the wall? I wish!!!
spike
Peter Croker
New
Croker Golf System
Dear Mr. Curtis,
Thank you for your question.
Homer Kelley developed a wonderful system of being able to assemble and understand the geometry and physics involved in the golf swing from short putt to the long drive.
This TGM technology allows a player or teacher to assemble their preferences in either a partial or full assembly of a golf motion.
CGS is an attempt to clearly define a "preferred" set of components from #1 to #24 within the framework set out in The Golfing Machine System.
In my journey of discoveries, I have always looked for the most efficient and workable components that fit one to another to produce an "uncompensating" golf swing with minimal stress on the body parts.
Alignment within and between the components (grip, stance, pivot, etc.) has been a major factor in building a "Golfing Machine like swing" that uses centrifugal force, momentum, and gravity to maximise the muscular effort applied by the golfer to hit the shot at hand.
I believe my journey is approaching its goal and destination.
During this visit to the USA in 2006 I am looking to get in good communication with TGM Senior Authorised Instructors and I see that by sharing our different experiences in using Homer's System we will build unity among TGM believers, of which I am one.
My research tells me that it is always a good idea to build on other's discoveries and together we can define more precisely workable ways to play and teach this game more efficiently. Homer Kelley has given us a great platform to work from!
Tom Tomasello told me that Homer was on a quest to fast track the application of his findings.
I have a high respect for Brian Manzella and that is why I am here in Louisville this weekend.
From my study of Brian's material, I see that he has a very high level of understandings of Homer's works.
I believe that Brian Manzella is having a strong influence on golf education at the PGA Instructor grass roots level.
In answer to your question, Brian and I teach the Three Imperatives applying the Three Functions through the Three Stations.
At this time, I believe we may have different preferences in how to get this job done.
I am sure we have many common beliefs in what makes up an effective golf swing.
Hope this helps.
Kindest Regards,
Peter
curtisj76 said:I hear different names come up from time to time - Manzella, Evans, Blake. What about Croker? Does he teach the same way?
Dear Mr. Curtis,
Thank you for your question.
Homer Kelley developed a wonderful system of being able to assemble and understand the geometry and physics involved in the golf swing from short putt to the long drive.
This TGM technology allows a player or teacher to assemble their preferences in either a partial or full assembly of a golf motion.
CGS is an attempt to clearly define a "preferred" set of components from #1 to #24 within the framework set out in The Golfing Machine System.
In my journey of discoveries, I have always looked for the most efficient and workable components that fit one to another to produce an "uncompensating" golf swing with minimal stress on the body parts.
Alignment within and between the components (grip, stance, pivot, etc.) has been a major factor in building a "Golfing Machine like swing" that uses centrifugal force, momentum, and gravity to maximise the muscular effort applied by the golfer to hit the shot at hand.
I believe my journey is approaching its goal and destination.
During this visit to the USA in 2006 I am looking to get in good communication with TGM Senior Authorised Instructors and I see that by sharing our different experiences in using Homer's System we will build unity among TGM believers, of which I am one.
My research tells me that it is always a good idea to build on other's discoveries and together we can define more precisely workable ways to play and teach this game more efficiently. Homer Kelley has given us a great platform to work from!
Tom Tomasello told me that Homer was on a quest to fast track the application of his findings.
I have a high respect for Brian Manzella and that is why I am here in Louisville this weekend.
From my study of Brian's material, I see that he has a very high level of understandings of Homer's works.
I believe that Brian Manzella is having a strong influence on golf education at the PGA Instructor grass roots level.
In answer to your question, Brian and I teach the Three Imperatives applying the Three Functions through the Three Stations.
At this time, I believe we may have different preferences in how to get this job done.
I am sure we have many common beliefs in what makes up an effective golf swing.
Hope this helps.
Kindest Regards,
Peter
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Share: