Brian Manzella
Administrator
I would publish two versions of TGM:
Theoretical TGM (Homer's 1982 Edition)
Practical TGM (Edited by AIs)
The original edition of TGM is outright silly and only attracts and fascinates the neurotic extreme of the golfing world, who think that complicated must be truth. The AIs ignore the sham science in Homer's TGM and try to decipher the methodology and terminology to incorporate it and enhance their personal teaching style.
TGM will fail unless it is made golfer-friendly, because most will not buy a pig-in-the-poke promising a golfswing if you educate your hands so you can apply PP#3 and a Flying Wedge. So get real fellas, because TGM is dying because it is a hocus-pocus voodoo golfswing theory. Sanitize TGM, reject the scientific crap, plainly list it's methodology, and stop trying to create a cult following who sound like a bunch of hari krishna golfers beating drums and jangling bells chanting "sustain the lag .. sustain the lag .... "
Theoretical TGM (Homer's 1982 Edition)
Practical TGM (Edited by AIs)
The original edition of TGM is outright silly and only attracts and fascinates the neurotic extreme of the golfing world, who think that complicated must be truth. The AIs ignore the sham science in Homer's TGM and try to decipher the methodology and terminology to incorporate it and enhance their personal teaching style.
TGM will fail unless it is made golfer-friendly, because most will not buy a pig-in-the-poke promising a golfswing if you educate your hands so you can apply PP#3 and a Flying Wedge. So get real fellas, because TGM is dying because it is a hocus-pocus voodoo golfswing theory. Sanitize TGM, reject the scientific crap, plainly list it's methodology, and stop trying to create a cult following who sound like a bunch of hari krishna golfers beating drums and jangling bells chanting "sustain the lag .. sustain the lag .... "