Inside aft and swinging left

Status
Not open for further replies.
Looking at the inside aft quadrant helps a lot with my pivot issues, but I believe I have a tendency to swing too far right with it and it leads to a lot of pushes and hooks. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to marry these two concepts?
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
Hope this helps:

golfclock.jpg
 
For someone that swings too far to the right and hooks it, would a flatter arc (arc shown in the clock picture) tend to correct the hook a bit? Again, from the overhead view as in the clock picture, a more upright swing plane and shallower arc would produce less hook action than a flattish plane and more rounded arc?
 
because of the curve brian has shown...the steeper the arc the less curve there will be...

Personally I think brian was just exagerating to show a point though.
 
3 dimensions ?

What factors govern the shape / dimensions of the curved path through the impact interval....

assuming Flat left wrist and Swinging (ie. centrifugal force etc)

What features of a curved path in 3D can be measured?

Radius of curvature
Angle of incline of the curve ( ie. plane angle)

but the two are not dependent on eachother...?? maybe ???

Does the radius of curvature have an effect on the rate of clubhead closing?? if using centrigugal throw out force to realease everything?
 
3D....only thing that can affect it are arm length and shaft length, no?

In this 2D representation plane angle will make it appear different.
 
Why do you believe the arc show in the picture is "flat?"

I don't, just the opposite. I butchered my question a bit trying to distinguish the clubhead arc from the arc in the pic. I could have asked "if the arc in the picture was flatter, would that result in less hook tendency?"

I was just trying to understand the effect of a steeper clubhaft plane on the tendency to hook vs a flatter clubshaft plane. Both will result in different arcs from a visual perspective i.e. the golfers view from above.

Hope I'm not causing more unnecessary confusion,,,
 
Last edited:
If I were to use a hoola hoop for a clock on the ground and put my ball at 12 0clock and stand towards the back of the hoop , how big a hoop would I need to get the right back swing and forward.???
 
If I were to use a hoola hoop for a clock on the ground and put my ball at 12 0clock and stand towards the back of the hoop , how big a hoop would I need to get the right back swing and forward.???

don't put your ball at 12 o'clock...

impact is an in-to-out motion... i think that low point is at twelve...ball a couple of minutes after 12...
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
The questions....

For someone that swings too far to the right and hooks it, would a flatter arc (arc shown in the clock picture) tend to correct the hook a bit? Again, from the overhead view as in the clock picture, a more upright swing plane and shallower arc would produce less hook action than a flattish plane and more rounded arc?

Would a "sharper curve" ala Ben Hogan, make it more or less likely to hook the ball?

If the face is staying "square" to the path (which I am NOT saying happens all the time by any stretch), it is CLOSING less quickly.

So for ANY given rate of "open and closing to the path" there is LESS with a "sharper curve."

So what?

Either you are an ELBOW PLANEr or a TURNED SHOULDER PLANEr, and you either have a Narrow or Wide Pivot, you have a ceratin release point, you have a certain hinge action. This is what produces the ARC!!


BUT THERE IS ALWAYS AN ARC!!! ....unless you buy in to that "if you swing out to right field a certain way the ball will fly stright crap."
 
Inside Aft?

Looking at the inside aft quadrant helps a lot with my pivot issues, but I believe I have a tendency to swing too far right with it and it leads to a lot of pushes and hooks. Does anyone have any ideas as to how to marry these two concepts?


"Inside Aft"- below the equator?
OR
"Inside Aft" above the equator?
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
Good Question...

"Inside Aft"- below the equator?
OR
"Inside Aft" above the equator?

Interesting point/quesion Mr. Mike!

The clubhead ACTUALLY CONTACTS the ball BELOW the equator on the inside-aft quadrant, BUT this is because of LOFT!! :eek:

If that same golf, with the EXCAT SAME PATTERN, had a ZERO LOFTED CLUB, it would hit ABOVE the equator! ;)

Soooooo.....Should the golfer also monitor the loft?

Hmmmmm....

Personally, I have done it both ways, and not at all.
 
Bigwill

That's right Brian and since Bigwill hasn't responded yet- I was guessing from his post that he was trying to hit the inside, aft, below the equator location where the face contacts the ball- which I think would cause a problem. I would assume that if you are just focusing on the lagging club- i.e. the sweetspot - hitting down on the ball then as a player you are always (disregarding unusual situations) going to be sensing the downward club - your contact point would always seem to be above the equator- as if there is no loft- since clubhead lag doesn't sense loft.

Brian, I would like to know in what sense/perspective you were saying that you could monitor the loft.

Thanks,
Mike
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
It is something I do with my wedges for mid sole, and trailing edge turf contact.

I have a technique to accomplish monitoring this, but I'd need to do a video to explain it well.
 
Sorry about that, Mike. Been a long weekend; I didn't even notice that it was my post you quoted!

Actually, when looking at the inside-aft quadrant, I'm generally looking at the part of the ball I can see, so I guess it's above the equator. My problem is that if I look inside-aft, I tend to keep swinging out to the right. I almost feel better off looking at the back of the ball (I know, I know). That's why I asked about the clubhead moving left after low point, even when focusing on the inside-aft quadrant on the way down.
 
Last edited:
Inside Aft- Or Back of the ball

Bigwill,
Inside Aft could be worse than back of the ball- so don't feel it's some cardinal sin to hit the back of the ball- after all inside aft is say only a dimple or two in from the back of the ball. So you are closer to the back than you are the inside. However, in regards to your swing- can't go to much further "theorizing"- you'd need to post a video for Brian or someone to comment on.
Good Luck with the game!
 
Bigwill,
Inside Aft could be worse than back of the ball- so don't feel it's some cardinal sin to hit the back of the ball- after all inside aft is say only a dimple or two in from the back of the ball. So you are closer to the back than you are the inside. However, in regards to your swing- can't go to much further "theorizing"- you'd need to post a video for Brian or someone to comment on.
Good Luck with the game!

Thanks, Mike.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top