Brian Manzella
Administrator
<iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/34442274?title=0&byline=0&portrait=0" width="700" height="525" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
Just give it some time and she'll get coached out of that. They all do.And you don't have a shot really showing the Lexi Thompson follow-through/finish, but she really has the 'left hand on the wall, left elbow stays left look" after impact look that you've described several times before before, as much as any top player that I've seen.
In watching her play, the thing I like about her, in addition to the swing and how far she hits it, is how non-mechanical her whole game appears. She seems like the antithesis of the overcoached modern player hitting line-drawing positions on slow-mo video, especially in the short game. The anti-Wie. She looks like someone who learned how to play out on the course trying to beat her brother, doing whatever it took to hit it as far as she could.
What we some of our learned friends here think would be the result of:
Arms, hands, coupling point, torquing and clubhead moving optimally in the downswing, a la Lexi, but the jump,/left shoulder moveback was absent? Would it fatally undermine everything that preceded it, or would it just make it slightly sub-optimal?
Thankyou Brian. I ask because I'm wondering if the following causality is rooted in logic:A little less speed, a little more downward angle of attack.
Now that's some serious analysis. Crack a walnut in your ass.
I'm the future of swing analysis. Seriously though I knew there was something to it when I noticed quite a few really great ball strikers tightened up their red zone D.Now that's some serious analysis. Crack a walnut in your ass.
A little less speed, a little more downward angle of attack.