I've always been under the impression that swinging was the preferred method. This is probably because Ben Doyle is the only AI that I've ever gone to see, and he teaches swinging. I've struggled and struggled trying to swing. I've had good results, at times, but I've also constantly fought the urge to hit at it with my hands and arms, flip because either I hit at it with the hands and arms, pivot stopped, left arm quit rotating - whatever. Today, just for the heck of it, I tinkered around with hitting. I have no AI here to talk to in person, but I believe I'm familiar with how to execute the procedure. So, I took my wedge and shag bag, and back to the school yard (they're really going to hate me if they ever take notice to the ever increasing divots that are popping up all over the place). To make a long story short, hitting seemed easy. I didn't feel like I was struggling in any way. All my pivot was really doing was moving my body into a position where I could drive PP#1 right through the aiming point. I had no problems keeping a flat left wrist. No problem trying to sequence everything just right, blah blah blah. Extensor action was much easier to feel as well since I'm driving the right arm anyway - something that I have always struggled with when trying to swing. If I applied any extensor action, I felt like my arms were overpowering the swinging procedure. I've always sort of suspected that I might have an easier time hitting but, for whatever reason, I had it in my mind that it was an inferior procedure. I finally let myself try it today and the results were more promising than I would have imagined for a first go at it. I might be a full time hitter real quick here if my practice sessions keep going like this. So, with all of that said, is there really a school of thought that says swinging is the superior procedure? If so, why? Brian, if you're reading this, do you typically teach hitting, or do you, like Ben, try to teach your students to swing? If so, why?
Thanks,
Jim
Thanks,
Jim