Kevin Shields
Super Moderator
Several media forms have been wondering aloud what the possible effect of Tiger's absence will be on the Tour. Discounted rates for title sponsors, lower purses, etc. They present the story, and others like it (the economy and free agents), like we the consumer should actually care. I think its a good thing, personally. Maybe we finally get it that a sane economy can not sustain golfers making twelve million for winning tournaments. What does it cost to go all day to a TOUR event? Or for that matter, baseball players making twenty five million while working fans pay $80-$100 a head to see them play.
Now perhaps if a winners check is $650,000 instead of 1.2 mil, the top players will tee it up more(better for TV), the players might embrace pro ams more and do the sponsors right.
My wife and I make a nice living, but it pisses me off to no end that it would cost me $150 or so to go see a friggin hockey game with our kids (in bad seats imight add). No wonder so many people have credit card debt. So if Tiger stays out long enough, maybe it will bring a little sanity back. I know I dont care a lick if the sponsors dont want to pay $6.5 million for an event. What does Finchem make, like $4 million? C'mon.
Rant over.
Now perhaps if a winners check is $650,000 instead of 1.2 mil, the top players will tee it up more(better for TV), the players might embrace pro ams more and do the sponsors right.
My wife and I make a nice living, but it pisses me off to no end that it would cost me $150 or so to go see a friggin hockey game with our kids (in bad seats imight add). No wonder so many people have credit card debt. So if Tiger stays out long enough, maybe it will bring a little sanity back. I know I dont care a lick if the sponsors dont want to pay $6.5 million for an event. What does Finchem make, like $4 million? C'mon.
Rant over.