NEW (Launch Direction Dictated by...) CHART from TrackMan Conference

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brian Manzella

Administrator
newCHART.jpg
 
This is a little clarification on a slide John Graham posted a while back on the Launch Direction (formerly Horizontal Launch Angle) being affected by the face angle or club path. The original slide shared by John was not color coded to indicate that different clubs were being used to plot the data. With the original slide, it may have been assumed that it was DRIVER DATA ONLY and it looked like as ball speed went up that the face angle had a bigger influence on the launch direction - which is not the case.
 
I remember that chart. Granted I am looking at this one in a little more detail but it makes sense and is readable.

Mike or Brian, is there any reason that a couple of the 9 irons and 6 irons had 90 % influence from face angle? Also any reason that some of the driver swings were closer to 70 percent instead of the 85 ish percent?

Really not sure if it matters, but I am curious if there is something different about those swings, like contact, loft, spinloft etc. It did not appear to correlated to more ball speed or less ball speed.

Thanks guys,

Steve
 
Not Mike or Brian:

But it looks to me like the driver is closer to 90% influence from the face angle and the 9 iron closer to 70%. As to what factors account for this beyond clubhead speed, i'll wait for Mike or Brian's response.
 

ZAP

New
The good news for me is that chart looks almost exactly like what I would have drawn if someone asked me what that chart would look like.
I just might "get" some of this.
 
Would vertical gear effect due to off center hits high or low on the face make a club influence the balls starting direction like it had more or less loft respectively? For example would a driver hit high on the face have a staring direction close to 75% of the face angle where as a driver hit low on the face have a starting direction closer to 95%?
 
Would vertical gear effect due to off center hits high or low on the face make a club influence the balls starting direction like it had more or less loft respectively? For example would a driver hit high on the face have a staring direction close to 75% of the face angle where as a driver hit low on the face have a starting direction closer to 95%?

Vert. gear effect only comes into play for the ballspin. If you hit it high on the face you will have more loft but that will be around 2 degree max. So indeed the ld will be less fa dictated but only by a small margin.
 
"With the original slide, it may have been assumed that it was DRIVER DATA ONLY and it looked like as ball speed went up that the face angle had a bigger influence on the launch direction - which is not the case. "

So are you saying as CH speed goes up (therefore ball speed increasing) face angle influence decreases & path influence increases?

thanks
 
"With the original slide, it may have been assumed that it was DRIVER DATA ONLY and it looked like as ball speed went up that the face angle had a bigger influence on the launch direction - which is not the case. "

So are you saying as CH speed goes up (therefore ball speed increasing) face angle influence decreases & path influence increases?

thanks

No, he is saying that ballspeed has NO relation.
 
"it looked like as ball speed went up that the face angle had a bigger influence on the launch direction - which is not the case. "

Based on the above words.........it is NOT the case that as ball speed went up.........face angle had a bigger influence on launch direction.

So.........does this mean that the influence STAYED THE SAME...........regardless of ball speed ? (as some say)
 
"it looked like as ball speed went up that the face angle had a bigger influence on the launch direction - which is not the case. "

Based on the above words.........it is NOT the case that as ball speed went up.........face angle had a bigger influence on launch direction.

So.........does this mean that the influence STAYED THE SAME...........regardless of ball speed ? (as some say)

Chino,

Buy Theodore Jorgensen book "The physics of golf" and then goto page 139 (technical appendix - section 3) There you will find that ball speed is a result of a lot of things going on during impact. Ballspeed and LD are the results of the d-plane they are not the input and therefor have no influence.
 
Last edited:
A couple thoughts I have coming out of the Users Conference...

1) The smaller the D-Plane "wedge" or triangle, the higher the % of Face influence. Thoughts?? (of course this is assuming no gear effect)

2) I wanted to ask about the new wedges with conforming grooves. Fredrik talked about a ping pong shot with a close to 90* open to sky paddle and a rubbery surface, the ball wont go up, but flat with a ton of spin, but if you have a wooden paddle it would pop straight up. I wonder if the new wedges are launching the ball any higher because of lesser friction.
 
My physics says CS is influence a la the variable numbers 70 - 85%

15% variable is a whopper to some

Impact ball with I Byron @ 20 mph then impact ball @ 120 mph with all parameters the same (except 100mph faster) & face angle influence % will be different
 
the chart is what it is - we don't know if it's different golfers within the plots....we don't know about how centered the hits were....we do know that the more oblique the contact (talking loft here) the less the ball responds to the normal to the face.....we would have to ask tuxen the exact effect of clubhead speed has on the ratio ALL OTHER PARAMETERS BEING EQUAL.....until then, we're probably guessing
 
Whoops....was editing.....I'd guess clubhead speed alone doesn't not influence LD's much at all within normal CS ranges.
 
A couple thoughts I have coming out of the Users Conference...

1) The smaller the D-Plane "wedge" or triangle, the higher the % of Face influence. Thoughts?? (of course this is assuming no gear effect)

2) I wanted to ask about the new wedges with conforming grooves. Fredrik talked about a ping pong shot with a close to 90* open to sky paddle and a rubbery surface, the ball wont go up, but flat with a ton of spin, but if you have a wooden paddle it would pop straight up. I wonder if the new wedges are launching the ball any higher because of lesser friction.

1. Yep. You could equate that to SpinLofts if you're just talking straight shots. The 'ole 85% driver, 75% irons, 65% lob wedge.

2. Yeah, probably a little bit. A change in coefficient of friction would change the launch ratios. It's a matter of proportion.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top