Came up in another thread. I'd like to know more about Lynn's post:
------------
holenone
For the record, 1968 would be the year before TGM's 1969 publication. Also for the record, Search For The Perfect Swing is chock full of errors -- not to mention omissions -- fifty of which Homer Kelley noted and sent to Gary Wiren, then head of instruction for the PGA, at his request.
holenone
---------------------
I don't agree with their specifics, but I do agree with their basic model. What, if any, errors were part of their specific basic model? If so, why are they errors?
This is what I have been asking all along. I think their basic model, is a great summary of how force moves in the swing, regardless of where it is seen as relating to the body.
Is that list something you can share some/all of? I'd like to learn more.
Thanks Lynn
------------
holenone
For the record, 1968 would be the year before TGM's 1969 publication. Also for the record, Search For The Perfect Swing is chock full of errors -- not to mention omissions -- fifty of which Homer Kelley noted and sent to Gary Wiren, then head of instruction for the PGA, at his request.
holenone
---------------------
I don't agree with their specifics, but I do agree with their basic model. What, if any, errors were part of their specific basic model? If so, why are they errors?
This is what I have been asking all along. I think their basic model, is a great summary of how force moves in the swing, regardless of where it is seen as relating to the body.
Is that list something you can share some/all of? I'd like to learn more.
Thanks Lynn