quote:Originally posted by jim_0068
The shoulder turn takeaway is a VALID OPTION. The problem with it is the "turn" gets over done. People get too much "around" and not enough "up" in their swing. This is when you get to the laid off position.
I use a shoulder turn takeaway and still trace a pretty darn straight plane line. Thing is that i practiced it with my plane lasers until i could do it automatically.
The key is if you use the shoulder turn takeaway you need to go "up" VERY QUICKLY after you go in, otherwise you'll be flat in the backswing.
quote:Originally posted by jim_0068
Garth, i don't understand your post.
First let's address the "laid off" comment and we will use Tiger's wedge shots as an example. Being on plane means that either the sweetspot of the club or the butt end of the club is pointing at the plane line. No one's perfect so sometimes it's inside a little and sometimes it's outside a little. But it should be pointing pretty darn close to that line. So assuming you understand this than you will realize that unless you reach the top/end of your backswing plane the club will APPEAR like it's "left" of the target however the butt end of that club will still point at the plane line. But once you reach the end of your swing and you are on plane the club will point parallel to your target line. And as you say, "full swings" are a different story because you've CONTINUED UP the plane to a very "normal" looking position.
Next, where did i say anything about picking anything up? All i said is that the club has to come up garth. The right elbow bends and brings the club "up" to some point in your swing, so that means the club is going to have to come back down. If you don't get enough "up" you will be off plane which is what i described above. Meaing if you turn your body too much and don't lift your arms enough you will have that butt end of the club pointing well to the outside of that plane line. Now sure, that's something you could very well do as long as you compensate some way on the downswing to get back on plane. But that's not the greatest idea. That's where inconsistency comes from.
Whether you use the eblow plane and appear to be more flat in the backswing vs the turning shoulder plane which appears to be more steep, both are still on plane. They are just using different plane angles. All golf swings rely on some sort of timing, rhythm, and tempo.
Also i didn't use any TGM terms. Unless you consider "plane" and "trace" to be specific TGM terms lol.
quote:Originally posted by Garth
quote:Originally posted by jim_0068
The shoulder turn takeaway is a VALID OPTION. The problem with it is the "turn" gets over done. People get too much "around" and not enough "up" in their swing. This is when you get to the laid off position.
I use a shoulder turn takeaway and still trace a pretty darn straight plane line. Thing is that i practiced it with my plane lasers until i could do it automatically.
The key is if you use the shoulder turn takeaway you need to go "up" VERY QUICKLY after you go in, otherwise you'll be flat in the backswing.
This is exactly what's been wrong with golf instruction forever. The reason handicaps have not changed in well over 30 years.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with being "laid off" at the top. Look at Tiger's wedge shots these days. He's laid off, makes a body turn back into the ball, leaves his arms passive, and all is good. His full swings are another story.
Picking the club "up" in the backswing means you have to drop it back down on the downswing. Throw whatever TGM terms you want, but that introduces timing into the equation, and that means inconsistency.
quote:Originally posted by Garth
quote:Originally posted by jim_0068
Garth, i don't understand your post.
First let's address the "laid off" comment and we will use Tiger's wedge shots as an example. Being on plane means that either the sweetspot of the club or the butt end of the club is pointing at the plane line. No one's perfect so sometimes it's inside a little and sometimes it's outside a little. But it should be pointing pretty darn close to that line. So assuming you understand this than you will realize that unless you reach the top/end of your backswing plane the club will APPEAR like it's "left" of the target however the butt end of that club will still point at the plane line. But once you reach the end of your swing and you are on plane the club will point parallel to your target line. And as you say, "full swings" are a different story because you've CONTINUED UP the plane to a very "normal" looking position.
Next, where did i say anything about picking anything up? All i said is that the club has to come up garth. The right elbow bends and brings the club "up" to some point in your swing, so that means the club is going to have to come back down. If you don't get enough "up" you will be off plane which is what i described above. Meaing if you turn your body too much and don't lift your arms enough you will have that butt end of the club pointing well to the outside of that plane line. Now sure, that's something you could very well do as long as you compensate some way on the downswing to get back on plane. But that's not the greatest idea. That's where inconsistency comes from.
Whether you use the eblow plane and appear to be more flat in the backswing vs the turning shoulder plane which appears to be more steep, both are still on plane. They are just using different plane angles. All golf swings rely on some sort of timing, rhythm, and tempo.
Also i didn't use any TGM terms. Unless you consider "plane" and "trace" to be specific TGM terms lol.
Thanks for no TGM terms
This part is what i have a problem with...
" Meaing if you turn your body too much and don't lift your arms enough you will have that butt end of the club pointing well to the outside of that plane line. Now sure, that's something you could very well do as long as you compensate some way on the downswing to get back on plane."
Why do you have to compensate? If the arms followed a natual path to get where they are, then why do they need to do anything different on the way back?
quote:Originally posted by Garth
This part is what i have a problem with...
" Meaing if you turn your body too much and don't lift your arms enough you will have that butt end of the club pointing well to the outside of that plane line. Now sure, that's something you could very well do as long as you compensate some way on the downswing to get back on plane."
Why do you have to compensate? If the arms followed a natual path to get where they are, then why do they need to do anything different on the way back?