ggsjpc
New
Brian, Kev and other instructors,
If a player has to get the face closed sooner with a wedge than they do with a driver, why wouldn't it make sense that stronger grips for short irons and weaker grips for drivers?
I know you mentioned that relative to the plane line that the face is more open with a short iron and that is why you've had greater success with weaker grips. You've mentioned in previous posts that you have had greater success in altering the plane line to get the right relationship of clubface angle and angle of attack.
My question is, do good players have a greater sense of square to the plane line or square to the target? My guess is, based on your findings, that better players have a greater sense of square relative to the plane line.
So, if a player is coming in with a face that is closing too soon with a short iron, do you try and make them swing more left or weaken their grip?
I mentioned before that I think this comparison is going to be the next big debate and I'm curious to see how it goes?
If a player has to get the face closed sooner with a wedge than they do with a driver, why wouldn't it make sense that stronger grips for short irons and weaker grips for drivers?
I know you mentioned that relative to the plane line that the face is more open with a short iron and that is why you've had greater success with weaker grips. You've mentioned in previous posts that you have had greater success in altering the plane line to get the right relationship of clubface angle and angle of attack.
My question is, do good players have a greater sense of square to the plane line or square to the target? My guess is, based on your findings, that better players have a greater sense of square relative to the plane line.
So, if a player is coming in with a face that is closing too soon with a short iron, do you try and make them swing more left or weaken their grip?
I mentioned before that I think this comparison is going to be the next big debate and I'm curious to see how it goes?