Phil Rosenbaum
New
Matt, always a pleasure to hear from you. If I remember correctly it was the grafalloy blue with nanotechnology. Nice catch. I had not thought of that reasoning. Can you expand on why the nano would compromise the shaft?
Matt, always a pleasure to hear from you. If I remember correctly it was the grafalloy blue with nanotechnology. Nice catch. I had not thought of that reasoning. Can you expand on why the nano would compromise the shaft?
Phil,
Did the shaft break in the grip about 4 inches from the butt, 15-17 inches from the butt or at the tip of the shaft?
Let me know.
MK
In which direction would you put the most stable axis?
ACould it be that this low point of the curve (about 20 mS) is the point of highest clubhead speed, and when it starts to slow the head starts moving toe-up.
BTW, what are the units of measurement of the black figures?
I would assume you'd try at least four positions (probably 6-8) and measure the results, including the effect on the ball flight and golfer's evaluation.
I know that this is a private conversation, but if you can shed some light on my shaft breaking I would appreciate it. Mine broke at the tip, right where the shaft entered the hosel.
the club lags and leads and droops and "toe ups" in 3 dimensions during the swing.....no amount of club building know how can give you more shaft stability with respect to the shaft's spine because of this continued bending and rebounding....
Dan Stone, titleist vice president of r&d, confirmed this yesterday during a webcast......
I know that this is a private conversation, but if you can shed some light on my shaft breaking I would appreciate it. Mine broke at the tip, right where the shaft entered the hosel.