lia41985
New member
Currently leads the ladies' first major, the Kraft Nabisco:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sL2t_wtp4JY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Those high hands are an interesting match with the flatter shoulder rotation/eventual sweet path. As Kevin stated:

<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sL2t_wtp4JY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Those high hands are an interesting match with the flatter shoulder rotation/eventual sweet path. As Kevin stated:
To which Brian replied:You can have high hands and a low plane angle, in fact its preferred
So what is it about the shoulders that makes high hands desirable:This is a CRITICAL POINT!!!!
I am talking about TOP OF THE BACKSWING shoulder-to-back turn difference.
Not whether his "Eventual Plane" was the "elbow plane," or any other steeper plane.
Just so you know, Dustin Johnson's left shoulder moves 60° more than his back.
One of our "Project 1.68" scientist, (not Rob Neal—and don't ask who) has done a lot of research on the strength to weight ratio of the shoulder area.
I will get a basic answer that will semi-satisfy without spilling to many beans.....
And what about consistency? Peter Thomson and Ben Hogan were super consistent ball strikers that "covered it" with a flatter eventual sweetspot path/shoulder rotation pattern. Is that possible with high hands?As far as the shoulder movement goes, this has been an observation of mine since I was pup teacher many moons ago:
The shoulders have to move beyond their cozy confines of address to hit the ball a lick.
One of our science pals, has told us in scientific terms why this movement is important.
Basically, it is a couple of more power generators.
So here's my takeaway from looking at Stacy Lewis' swing: some components can match really wellThere is absolutely no reason high hands would cause any inconsistency if you know what you can and cant do with it. This idea that low hands being more consistent is absurd. Maybe it is for some, maybe not. But to say it as if it were just common knowledge is just plain wrong. I know plenty of people that have components that dont mesh at all with low hands.
Last edited: