Well this is my first post here. I read the article about Plummer and Bennett and I had never heard of the TGM. I am a nut about golf swings and decided to look into the book, so I went to amazon and read some comments. Wow, how polarizing, some loved the book the others hated it. Among the comments someone mentioned BrianManzella.com, so I have been lurking the past few days....My question is how is the TGM pivot any different then what the main stream teachers teach? I am having a bit of trouble following a lot of the post strictly because TGM uses different jargon than I am familiar with. I have orded the TGM book and am looking foward to looking into this method of teaching.
Matt,
Welcome to the "yellow side". TGM is not for the faint of heart. But if you're a student of the golf swing who believes that perhaps it's a motion that REALLY MIGHT be governed by the laws of physics and geometry (unlike many woud have you believe), it may be the book for you. I find those that dislike it fall into one or some of the following categories:
1) they're impatient
2) are looking for quick tips and band-aids only
2a) read only Golf Digest or Golf Magazine (and use them for their instruction)
3) don't have the time to invest in studying it
4) frustrate easily with golf instruction books that don't start with the grip and end with "how to putt"
5) are searching for a swing "method"
It's one of the few instruction books that really was written for the instructor (thus Homer's desire to send an AI with every book), but which is accesible by all.
Thank God for the internet and sites like Brian's (and others). They have gone quite a ways in getting some grass-roots momentum for TGM. I assure you that if you can develop a reasonable understanding of the key concepts you will be well on your way to playing much better golf, and more importantly, you'll know WHY you're playing better!!!
Good luck,
Robbo