Brian Manzella
Administrator
I see folks all the time using a "top of the backswing" photo to show how much movement of one kind or another is happening "by the top of the backswing," or something like that.
Every really good swinger is their furthest away from the target around a 3/4th to 4/5th of the club movement away from the ball, going back.
So, in my opinion, it is more accurate to show the furthest away from the target movement as a true "end of the backswing" and the "end of the club movement" as part of the transition.
A great example is Masters Champ Jordan Speith.
<div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script><div class="fb-video" data-allowfullscreen="true" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689&set=o.125831854138004&type=1"><div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore"><blockquote cite="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689"></a><p>I see folks all the time using a "top of the backswing" photo to show how much movement of one kind or another is happening "by the top of the backswing," or something like that.Every really good swinger is their furthest away from the target around a 3/4th to 4/5th of the club movement away from the ball, going back.So, in my opinion, it is more accurate to show the furthest away from the target movement as a true "end of the backswing" and the "end of the club movement" as part of the transition.A great example is Masters Champ Jordan Speith.</p>Posted by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/brian.manzella.7">Brian Manzella</a> on Tuesday, April 14, 2015</blockquote></div></div>
Every really good swinger is their furthest away from the target around a 3/4th to 4/5th of the club movement away from the ball, going back.
So, in my opinion, it is more accurate to show the furthest away from the target movement as a true "end of the backswing" and the "end of the club movement" as part of the transition.
A great example is Masters Champ Jordan Speith.
<div id="fb-root"></div><script>(function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "//connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.3"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));</script><div class="fb-video" data-allowfullscreen="true" data-href="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689&set=o.125831854138004&type=1"><div class="fb-xfbml-parse-ignore"><blockquote cite="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689"><a href="https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10206090657735689"></a><p>I see folks all the time using a "top of the backswing" photo to show how much movement of one kind or another is happening "by the top of the backswing," or something like that.Every really good swinger is their furthest away from the target around a 3/4th to 4/5th of the club movement away from the ball, going back.So, in my opinion, it is more accurate to show the furthest away from the target movement as a true "end of the backswing" and the "end of the club movement" as part of the transition.A great example is Masters Champ Jordan Speith.</p>Posted by <a href="https://www.facebook.com/brian.manzella.7">Brian Manzella</a> on Tuesday, April 14, 2015</blockquote></div></div>
