Tiger's Swing through the years

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's an interesting set of pictures, but I dont understand the quotes made by the author in the impact and post impact frames.

Tiger is clearly more out to the right and more of a draw release in the 2009 pictures, and it claims he's swinging more left to produce a "soft fade". Nothing about the last four pictures in the 2009 sequence say fade, everything about them is indicating a draw!!!

Stew
 
That's an interesting set of pictures, but I dont understand the quotes made by the author in the impact and post impact frames.

Tiger is clearly more out to the right and more of a draw release in the 2009 pictures, and it claims he's swinging more left to produce a "soft fade". Nothing about the last four pictures in the 2009 sequence say fade, everything about them is indicating a draw!!!

Agreed. Anyone who has watched Tiger on TV this spring can notice that he is set up for and hitting a lot more draws.

It also surprises me that in the hours and hours and hours of commentary we hear on Tiger, no one has mentioned what I think might be the biggest change in his swing since the injury: the physical and swing changes mean that Tiger has eliminated the 90 yard right driver that plagued him for many years. Remember all those times at Torrey that he hit it two fairways over? Tiger's misses to the right are now just in the right rough...
 
I had two problems with that article. First, they skipped the 2000-2001 period when his swing was fantastic. His British Open performance was downright spectacular ball striking.

Second, why is there all this emphasis on drawing the ball with the driver? Do the tour players honestly need the draw shape to get distance? I'm very surprised Tiger, with all his power, hasn't gone the power-fade route. I do understand Augusta being "setup for draws", but something historically says that in the long run a power-fade is more reliable.

Maybe I'm wrong, but I sure don't want to see this flat Hank Haney parallel lines swing turn Tiger into a hooker / blocker, or a one shot trick pony. We already saw some of it at the last US Open. Huge uncontrolled draws with all clubs that left Tiger swearing up a storm. Yeah yeah... he was on a bad knee, blah blah. Fact is, he is still making almost the same swing, with only a mild pivot adjustment with the better knee. That's not gonna help when he starts coming way from the inside and snapping the clubhead over to get it squared.

If Tiger took his current backswing, eliminated the popout, got a slight cup back at the top of the swing (like he used to have btw), and learn to release to the left rather than slinging both arms DTL (so he gets an inside to square to inside path going), he could be absolutely dangerous AND he could shape it both ways on command with the same accuracy.

Ben Hogan said the most important club in the bag to a tournament player was the driver (although today, he probably would say putter and be mad as hell about it). I really think this is the only thing holding Tiger back from total domination.

I saw an interview a year back with Lee Trevino. Trevino said exactly the same thing as I am advocating. He even said he sent Tiger a letter saying "meet me in Texas and I'll teach you to power-fade the ball with the driver". Tiger never responded. Trevino seemed almost hurt. If there is one player living today who knows how to really drive for accuracy... it's Trevino (ok, and Nicklaus because as we know, Nicklaus was a hell of a driver). Trevino said Tiger is without a doubt the best player he has ever seen, except for the driver.

Tiger probably should have taken him up on that offer. I'm not saying Tiger should swing "like" Trevino, just that I bet he could learn something from Trevino about driving for accuracy.
 
[Tiger] could be absolutely dangerous...Trevino even said he sent Tiger a letter saying "meet me in Texas and I'll teach you to power-fade the ball with the driver". Tiger never responded.

Man, I don't mean to sound like a jerk but Tiger's pretty dangerous as he is. I'm sure he realizes he's not the most accurate driver, and I'm also sure that it's one of the things he works on, worries about, and goes to sleep thinking of.

Every player has at least one aspect of the game that he struggles with. Tiger's amazing because he has only one, that being his driving accuracy. I can't think of any other faults within his game. He's held to such a high standard that his one deficiency gets blown out of proportion, and we say things like, "If Tiger could hit 75% of his fairways, he'd really tear it up."

Yeah, it would be cool if Tiger hit more fairways, but he doesn't and yet still manages to win. A lot. If he hit more fairways, he'd be perfect, and nobody's perfect.
 
Good point. It is relative and it is amazing that Tiger really only has that one weakness.

Still... it's amazing it has stayed his weakness so long (given his dedication, work ethic, etc).
 
Does it matter?

I took the 2007 stats top 75 in Distance and top 75 in Accuracy and compared. I used 2007 since TW had a bad knee in 2008.
The Following players(w stats) were the only ones in both groups:
Bill Lunde * 63.87
Bill Lunde * 288.1
Bo Van Pelt 70.7
Bo Van Pelt 286
Boo Weekley 65.48
Boo Weekley 287.3
D.J. Trahan * 69.13
D.J. Trahan * 289.2
Jeff Maggert * 71.38
Jeff Maggert * 285.5
John Senden * 64.44
John Senden * 295.7
Jonathan Byrd * 64.62
Jonathan Byrd * 300
Ken Duke * 64.44
Ken Duke * 286
Lucas Glover 64.74
Lucas Glover 295.9
Mathew Goggin * 69.3
Mathew Goggin * 290.8
Will MacKenzie 64.94
Will MacKenzie 287.4


A good list of players but certainly not superstars.
 
Does anyone have a swing sequence of Tiger from 2000 that they could post, that could be compared with the other years?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top