James Marshall (Hogan1953)
New member
I'm trying to get straight in my head the arguments for and against "X-factor" type pivots, i.e. pivots which encourage a as big as possible differential between the amount of turn of the hips and the amount of turn of the shoulders.
Is this a useful way of generating speed in the swing or is the idea that stretching the muscles almost to their maximum to gain some spring-like affect in the downswing not really how they work?
I know "Golfing Machine" and MORAD models are much more in favour of a "maximum participation" pivot which encourages a bigger hip turn and therefore in theory a bigger shoulder turn which in turn encourages more rotation throughout the swing and potentially more clubhead speed.
I would appreciate any input on the subject. Thanks.
Is this a useful way of generating speed in the swing or is the idea that stretching the muscles almost to their maximum to gain some spring-like affect in the downswing not really how they work?
I know "Golfing Machine" and MORAD models are much more in favour of a "maximum participation" pivot which encourages a bigger hip turn and therefore in theory a bigger shoulder turn which in turn encourages more rotation throughout the swing and potentially more clubhead speed.
I would appreciate any input on the subject. Thanks.