I remember it was established fairly conclusively a while back that there is no such thing as compressing the ball against the ground. If that is the case I'm interested in the vastly different trajectory of a ball from a tight, dry and firm fairway as compared to sitting up in soft wet grass. With the latter there is no compression at impact when hitting a small pitch shot and it's very easy to hit a shot that goes nowhere even if it feels like good contact is made.
My guess at this is that from a tight lie even though there is no compression of ball against turf the ball will spend more time on the grooves because the club is kept close to the ball once it strikes the turf. The club bounces or slides along the turf and compression will be slightly, if only fractionally, longer. When hitting a ball purched up on the grass the blow is very much a glancing blow with very little compression.
I've found it's better to play the shot sitting up in the rough with a neutral path and not cutting across it and also to feel as if I'm hitting it very level if not slightly hitting up on it. This gives a really nice strike on the sweet spot. The hitting up counteracts the driving or forwards momentum of not cutting across it and helps to find the sweet spot better instead of sliding under it. In other words, I feel like this way I get a shot that is closer to the natural flight of the particular club as opposed to one that is low and weak.
The obvious reply would be to say that out of the rough you are getting grass in the grooves but I think there is more to it than that. Especially since sometimes the ball can sit cleanly on top of the rough.
I'd like to hear what anyone else thinks about these two very different lies and the reaction of the ball.
My guess at this is that from a tight lie even though there is no compression of ball against turf the ball will spend more time on the grooves because the club is kept close to the ball once it strikes the turf. The club bounces or slides along the turf and compression will be slightly, if only fractionally, longer. When hitting a ball purched up on the grass the blow is very much a glancing blow with very little compression.
I've found it's better to play the shot sitting up in the rough with a neutral path and not cutting across it and also to feel as if I'm hitting it very level if not slightly hitting up on it. This gives a really nice strike on the sweet spot. The hitting up counteracts the driving or forwards momentum of not cutting across it and helps to find the sweet spot better instead of sliding under it. In other words, I feel like this way I get a shot that is closer to the natural flight of the particular club as opposed to one that is low and weak.
The obvious reply would be to say that out of the rough you are getting grass in the grooves but I think there is more to it than that. Especially since sometimes the ball can sit cleanly on top of the rough.
I'd like to hear what anyone else thinks about these two very different lies and the reaction of the ball.
Last edited: