BertramSterling
New
Can anyone help explain to me the following image, from the Steven Nesbit paper on hub path:
The initial move is far less ‘tangential’ than I expected - is this to prevent jacknifing of the club?
Also, I didn’t expect a much narrower path. Lets say you are the golfer above, with the ‘Actual’ hand path...how do you go about getting onto the ‘Optimized’ path? More of a weight shift toward the target?
The final part of the optimized path makes sense; moving upward at impact and bottoming out earlier. Also I understand that this is optimal for this particular golfer and not everyone.
The initial move is far less ‘tangential’ than I expected - is this to prevent jacknifing of the club?
Also, I didn’t expect a much narrower path. Lets say you are the golfer above, with the ‘Actual’ hand path...how do you go about getting onto the ‘Optimized’ path? More of a weight shift toward the target?
The final part of the optimized path makes sense; moving upward at impact and bottoming out earlier. Also I understand that this is optimal for this particular golfer and not everyone.