I don't believe that SMT is better than taylormade and i don't think taylormade is any better than SMT; these days with driver heads it's all about the loft and the COG of the head.
The nice thing about component clubs is that if you order a 9.5* head they will usually hand pick you a 9.5* head. When you go buy a 9.5* off the rack at golfsmith, it most likely as anywhere between 10.5* to 11* and i'm not exaggerating.
I don't believe that SMT is better than taylormade and i don't think taylormade is any better than SMT; these days with driver heads it's all about the loft and the COG of the head.
The nice thing about component clubs is that if you order a 9.5* head they will usually hand pick you a 9.5* head. When you go buy a 9.5* off the rack at golfsmith, it most likely as anywhere between 10.5* to 11* and i'm not exaggerating.
Honestly, if Taylormade wanted to get into the LDA, it could and it would dominate. All they would have to do is throw some sponsorship money around (like they do on the PGA Tour to win the Darrell Survey driver counts), design some heads specifically for the LDA guys so that they would handle the abuse and boom, they'd have a big presence.
I just don't think it is something that they want to do, most likely part of their branding image since they correlate their drivers with the best players in the world.
I'm not trying to be smug or start a fight but my profession is in Financial/Business Analysis and these are my professional opinions as to why taylormade isn't in LDA.