It occurred to me recently that most players unmanipulated bad shots were based on an out to in motion of the club...
By unmanipulated, I mean when they are not forcing the clubface to stay open (push or push slice)...
Even the pros unmanipulated misses are mainly pulls (as far as I can see)....
Does that mean that an out-to in swing is natural to most golfers...and if that is the case, why do we spend so much time trying to correct it?....Why don't we simply work with out-to-in...
Some years ago I read a book by a guy who was advocating exactly that..His theory was that if you give an average person an axe and ask them to go and chop down a tree, you will more than likely see them set up to the tree with their feet extremely closed and they will swing the axe right across their left hip in a natural out-to-in fashion..
Why don't we do the same with our golf swing....do the feet really have to be square to the target, or is that just a visual crutch?...
Thoughts anyone?...
By unmanipulated, I mean when they are not forcing the clubface to stay open (push or push slice)...
Even the pros unmanipulated misses are mainly pulls (as far as I can see)....
Does that mean that an out-to in swing is natural to most golfers...and if that is the case, why do we spend so much time trying to correct it?....Why don't we simply work with out-to-in...
Some years ago I read a book by a guy who was advocating exactly that..His theory was that if you give an average person an axe and ask them to go and chop down a tree, you will more than likely see them set up to the tree with their feet extremely closed and they will swing the axe right across their left hip in a natural out-to-in fashion..
Why don't we do the same with our golf swing....do the feet really have to be square to the target, or is that just a visual crutch?...
Thoughts anyone?...