This has been on my mind for a while now…
Last year we had a very long thread about club head speed/effective mass etc etc…anyway, Mandrin more or less proved (scientifically..
) that it was pure c/head speed that dictated the final velocity of the ball…and you can’t add/create any additional effective mass to the c/head…
Now I have no beef with this at all….
However,
One thing doesn’t sit right and seems to be a contradiction…..
What about when you play out of the rough?
We’ve all seen the pros do it, with comments from the commentators of “You have to be strong to play that shot”..etc, etc….
I know the objective is to counter the resistance of the grass, which wraps around the hosel, or the baby gopher that sticks his head up and bites the toe of the club
, but to a greater or lesser degree the ball offers resistance too, so why don’t the same “muscle” principles apply when there is no grass present? …..
What am I missing here? Anyone?….
Last year we had a very long thread about club head speed/effective mass etc etc…anyway, Mandrin more or less proved (scientifically..
Now I have no beef with this at all….
However,
One thing doesn’t sit right and seems to be a contradiction…..
What about when you play out of the rough?
We’ve all seen the pros do it, with comments from the commentators of “You have to be strong to play that shot”..etc, etc….
I know the objective is to counter the resistance of the grass, which wraps around the hosel, or the baby gopher that sticks his head up and bites the toe of the club
What am I missing here? Anyone?….