Matt Bryda
New
ekennedy,
I was writing it like I was in a lesson situation, not directing it to you.
I was writing it like I was in a lesson situation, not directing it to you.
Has anyone ever found a correlation between alignment and underplane in some players? It seems the more a player aims left of their target, the more likely they are at dropping the club underplane and swinging right (or swiping low left.) The more a player aims right of their target, the more likely they would be to carry the club and swing steeper and more to the left.
Obviously, there are exceptions.
A player's on-course tendencies (like alignment and ball position) may lead to misses they might not see in a typical practice or warm-up session before a round.
Thoughts?
I've definitely experienced this before many times on course. I always chalked it up to not trusting the swing i was trying to make. Aiming left to hit a cut and my body says "No, no, no. You didn't really mean to aim that far left, what if you pull it?" Then I end up hitting it right of right. The range I practice at is like 200 yards wide, and I practice much more then I play because of time and money. I think with that much wide open space the penalty of such a bad miss doesn't really sink in till I'm on a tight course rifling through my bag for more balls.
Virtuoso,
Picture the 18th tee at Sawgrass for example. Easy to shift your aim away from the water, which as we all know, has some pretty detrimental affects on your swing as well as your psyche.
David Toms' drive on the 72nd hole, a bleeder fade off the railroad ties, tells me everything I need to know about that guys confidence.
'At the top' and 'transition' are two different things of course. I know loads of players who are across at the top and lay it off in transition.
I think he should have laid up on 16. I know he made an uncharacteristically poor swing, but it is always a matter of how best to play the hole. I played Sawgrass about 10 years ago as a college player. What I noticed about 16 was that it is an improbable up and down from left of the green (that should be apparent if you have ever watched the tournament) Also the difficulty of the 17th hole is exaggerated, the green is frikkin' huge (OK...3 putting is likely) but hit the green is not a tall order (OK...under pressure with swirling winds...maybe) In a way 18 plays a lot like 16. The easisest thing in the world not to do on that hole is hit it in the water off the tee. However, par is slim if you bail out right. Anything left on 16...dead. Anything right on 16...deader. Short...money. Would I have laid up? Hell no! From 220 and change I'm firing it at the pin! Of course, I would most likely hit it in the little pot bunker left (I have in fact) and make a nervous 5 (which I did) Easy to second guess I know, but that is what armchair commentating is all about! I love The Tank, but I thought it was David's turn.
[/B]
Nuthin' like internet forum players always better than a touring pro...my guess is you would have passed out at address if you substituted for Toms to hit that shot.
Has anyone ever found a correlation between alignment and underplane in some players? It seems the more a player aims left of their target, the more likely they are at dropping the club underplane and swinging right (or swiping low left.) The more a player aims right of their target, the more likely they would be to carry the club and swing steeper and more to the left.
Obviously, there are exceptions.
A player's on-course tendencies (like alignment and ball position) may lead to misses they might not see in a typical practice or warm-up session before a round.
Thoughts?