Agreed. I think the magazines need articles on things more useful to the weekend golfer.
Something like...
Perfecting your Short Pitch Technique: 5 Methods for Success
Perfecting your Chipping Technique: 5 Methods for Success
Range Games: How to make the most out of your practice time
Stats Tracking for Lower Scores
Back to Basics: How to ensure your every swing has the best chance of success
Analyze your swing faults: A primer on video analyzing your swing and how to fix 10 most common faults
The articles must be poised as "if you are having this problem, it could be for reasons x,y, or z. Try A, B, or C and see if they help" And I don't mean "if you're a one plane swinger try x, if a two plane swinger try y." That Jim Hardy stuff really peeves me. I get what he was trying to do, but it has gone too far in the golfing community.
Attempts to "classify" people's swings into a discrete set of very limited categories usually fails. "Toes left foot out at address or has it square" that I would buy. "One plane or two plane swing" sorry, not buying it.
Like Harvey Penick said "Take an aspirin, but don't take the whole bottle"
Oh, and would instructors please stop using the "You're trying to lift the ball into the air" excuse for everything? I highly doubt a lot of people are thinking of scooping the ball up and throwing it to the target. The problem is a misdirection of instruction about what "hitting down" means. You don't neccessarily "hit down". You swing through with the low point of the arc ahead of the ball. Those who you tell to just hit down turn into over the top slicers, toppers, and a bunch of other problems. Sorry, had to get that out...