Are we close to seeing "ideal" numbers from Trackman?
Last edited:
Are we close to seeing "ideal" numbers from Trackman?
Vertical plane angle depends alot on someone's height so again there are no ideals at all. Only ideals for individuals.
Again i understand; but i think you could create a model that is ideal for an assumed average height and then deviate from there for an individual's personal nuances.
Would vertical plane not only be effected by the height of a golfer, but also by many other physical factors/swing factors perceptions..ie chest size,bicep size,"feel versus real" etc.etc.?? Is it possible to even come up up with a "model"??, I guess is what Im asking. BTW...Im not trying to start an arguement, just wondering.
Not really.
But "Pattern #13" will be a TrackMan, D-Plane, OPTIMIZED pattern with ALLL THE NUMBERS PROVIDED!
Not really.
But "Pattern #13" will be a TrackMan, D-Plane, OPTIMIZED pattern with ALLL THE NUMBERS PROVIDED!