Brian Manzella
Administrator
At least a couple of people (like you Birdie Man) get me.
quote:Originally posted by DOCW3
quote:Originally posted by Peter Croker
[?]Dear Brian,
As my first time to your forum as a member, I would like to ask
"What do you think of Jim Hardy's "One Plane Swing".
I have read his book but not taken lessons from Jim in person so I do not know exactly his "hands on" teachings (and as we know we can get much more of the truths of a method when getting a lesson from the source of the material.)
All I know is that I have seen several students of the method "downunder" have problems with their backs following their attempts to adopt these principles.
What has been your experience?
Mr Croker~
With the understanding that you are "The" Peter Croker, I want to thank you for your contributions to this wonderful game.
Next, do you feel there is any relationship of Jim Hardy's One Plane to Mr. Kelley's zero shift? And, are you still teaching the back and up motion described in Hit Basics?
DRW
quote:Originally posted by jim_0068
Welcome Peter
What i don't like about the hardy one plane swing is that you have to STEEPEN your downswing to make it work because the backswing is UNDER the turned shoulder plane at the top of the swing.
Thus you have to have a bent plane line coming into the ball (out/in). You can see this when Olin Browne takes his practice swings:
- big shoulder turn that sucks the club way inside and under plane
- bending the right arm to lift the club to the top but you're too "in" so you can't reach the turned shoulder plane
- slight "steepening" move to reach the TSP but to do that you have to move the shoulder OUT
- which then forces you to come out/in on the downswing.
As long as you angle hinge, it's a perfectly viable pattern...but it's just that. One type of pattern.