Richie,
I noticed on your blog that you listed Ballard as a top teacher (i think #1) would you pass up the chance to pick his brain?
thanks,
Ric
I never put him at a #1 teacher.
I had him in my top 50 teacher list. He was listed first because I put the names of instructors in alphabetical order. Brian, Kevin Shields and others are in the list as well.
I have worked with Jimmy. I liked him and I agree with Brian, if there's one *method* teacher that you had to choose from, I'd take Ballard.
But again, it's a question saying if you HAD to use a METHOD teacher's philosophy. I don't have to work with a method teacher and I don't want to work with a method teacher, so that's why I had no ambition to go back to working with Jimmy when I got back into the game.
I do think he is a good teacher.
I do think his way can help a lot of golfers.
But I also see a lot of shortcomings in his method.
My feeling on what you are asking has nothing to do with leaving Brian. If the situation was reversed and you told me that you were having nice success working with Jimmy and you were thinking of working with Brian, I'd suggest you avoid it.
It's like Crash Davis once said 'don't ever mess with a winning streak.' Same for golf IMO.
Now, if you had good success with Brian and felt you had reached a plateau and thought Jimmy could take you over that plateau, then it may be a good idea to give it a shot. But that doesn't sound like the case to me and I think you're really just going to take longer and spend more to improve.
I imagine you'll go to Ballard regardless of what I say, but IMO it's risking the factor of taking a step or two back and then Brian having to repair that regression.
3JACK