I think Johnny would have done great.
Oops, not the answer many here expected. I think Johnny would've done fine with Tiger also.
But, Tiger was / is so good that he'd make anyone teaching him look good.
I think Johnny would have done great.
I think Johnny would have done great.
Many of you may or not know the story of when I "interviewed" for the job with Mr. Earl when Tiger was 15.
Brian,
You're one in a million. Great story about Earl Woods and I'm with you: Johnny Miller knows how to swing a golf club. When I was a teenager Miller was in his prime. When he was on he was the best I ever saw. I saw him in person just a few times: he shot the easiest 66 I ever saw while winning the 1974 Kaiser at Silverado. I mean everything he hit was right on the button, right down the middle, right at the flag. He didn't even make that many putts. He also came and gave a clinic at a junior tournament I played in. He was late and he jumped out of a car and started hitting shot after shot after shot with every club in the bag just absolutely beautifully, fades, draws, bombing drives, just everything was struck perfectly. He even had the most powerful one armed swing (left arm, his lead arm) I had and have every seen. It was at that moment that I knew I better find something else to shoot for as a career because I knew I could never hit the ball as well as Johnny. Little did I know I was watching one of the best ball strikers EVER. I'm positive he could help Tiger.
I like Johnny Miller.
I've dealt with him personally a number of times, and take his mannerisms with a grain of salt. Do I cringe everytime he says something about impact physics on TV? Yes. But certain character traits are annoying to certain people and his don't really bother me.
Many times, we've been having a conversation about something unrelated to golf....say Bridgestone tires, and he will somehow, with total absense of malice, weave the conversation into a story about how he was the first American tour player to take on a Japanese sponsor, which will subsequently lead to a footnote about how he beat Nicklaus by 13 shots at a tournamant held on the first course built in Japan over 7000 yards.
Anyone else hijacking the conversation that way would irritate the heck out of you, but he has the unique ability to say it in such a matter of fact way, that it doesn't bother me at all. It actually makes me smile and giggle a little on the inside because I'm thinking: "Does he know how arrogant that might sound to people?" You really get the sense he's only saying it because he thinks you might enjoy the story....which, inevitably I do.
Overall, I think he is a good and decent human being that isn't ashamed to talk about the incredible acomplishments he's had in his life.
On TV, does he proclaim some things as gospel that are catagorically false? Yes, but if you listen carefully, there is an abundant amount of subtle truth about how to play great golf, especially great tournamant golf.
And let me say this: personally, I much prefer his style to other "knowledgeable", "world class" teachers and players that have come at me with a wheelbarrel full of obvious false modesty. Those are the guys that really annoy me!
Humility is a gift Johnny Miller has yet to receive.
I hear ya!
I saw a 60-ish Byron Nelson give a clinic, didn't see Hogan or Snead (until Snead was a sideshow at Augusta).
I've seen everyone else since.
I ve said it multiple times, and will continue to say it:
Johnny Miller hit it better than anyone I've ever seen.
Now that doesn't qualify you to help a hacker. much less a Tiger, but I've heard Miller talk about the swing and I've heard Haney talk as well.
Trust me folks, I rather take a lesson from Miller.
I love how much you hate Johnny Miller!![]()
... but I've heard Miller talk about the swing and I've heard Haney talk as well.
Trust me folks, I rather take a lesson from Miller.
I like Johnny Miller.
I've dealt with him personally a number of times, and take his mannerisms with a grain of salt. Do I cringe everytime he says something about impact physics on TV? Yes. But certain character traits are annoying to certain people and his don't really bother me.
Many times, we've been having a conversation about something unrelated to golf....say Bridgestone tires, and he will somehow, with total absense of malice, weave the conversation into a story about how he was the first American tour player to take on a Japanese sponsor, which will subsequently lead to a footnote about how he beat Nicklaus by 13 shots at a tournamant held on the first course built in Japan over 7000 yards.
Anyone else hijacking the conversation that way would irritate the heck out of you, but he has the unique ability to say it in such a matter of fact way, that it doesn't bother me at all. It actually makes me smile and giggle a little on the inside because I'm thinking: "Does he know how arrogant that might sound to people?" You really get the sense he's only saying it because he thinks you might enjoy the story....which, inevitably I do.
Overall, I think he is a good and decent human being that isn't ashamed to talk about the incredible acomplishments he's had in his life.
On TV, does he proclaim some things as gospel that are catagorically false? Yes, but if you listen carefully, there is an abundant amount of subtle truth about how to play great golf, especially great tournamant golf.
And let me say this: personally, I much prefer his style to other "knowledgeable", "world class" teachers and players that have come at me with a wheelbarrel full of obvious false modesty. Those are the guys that really annoy me!