Oosthuizen has a beautiful swing....what I am sick of, is anytime someone says this person or that has a beautiful swing, maybe one of the best ever...someone always brings up Hogan and Snead....as if no one is allowed to have a good swing but those two.
Give me a break.
He said he has the best swing *ever.*
I can understand some hyperbole...but I think this is wayyyy too strong of hyperbole.
I think we can break down swings into 2 different ways.
1. Pure ballstriking related statistics.
2. Combination of ballstriking stats and swing mechanics.
The problem is that Oosthuizen's ballstriking related stats are not all that impressive this year. So, that eliminates #1. If his ballstriking stats were in the 'really good, but not the best', then I could see. But that's not even the case. They are very average. And that's looking at stats like driving distance, fwy %, avg. distance to edge of fairway, proximity to the cup from certain distances, etc.
Personally, I'd take guys like Boo Weekley, Heath Slocum, Charles Warren and Hunter Mahan over Oosthuizen at this point in time. I like their mechanics and they have much stronger stats (Warren isn't on Tour this year, but he's been phenomenal in the previous years).
This ain't even about Hogan and Snead...it's about other golfers who have as strong, if not stronger mechanics and who are also much stronger statistically. Then you have somebody like Furyk, who according to Trackman has the most consistently zeroed out downswing on Tour and has good ballstriking stats.
It doesn't have jack to do with 'no one being allowed to have a good swing', it's about making bold statements without much backing it up.
3JACK