golfbulldog
New
Brian, i think that you use this expression to describe the way that the clubshaft, head and face all act in an optimum way for that individual player so that imperatives are demonstrated and impact alignment and physics are optimised - is that a reasonable interpretation of the way you use this expression? When i swing well , i get a sense of the club just having to do what it does - release, impact and hinge and finishh swivel just happen so easily and sooo quickly.... the club is running on rails!
If so, and this next stage relies on a Gedanken experimental approach, if you could program the club to behave in this way ( individualised to the player) and the player just had to hang on and learn the way that their body needed to react/create this movement .... would this be a uselfu learning tool??
I know the concept of a floating club, repeatedly tracing out an optimum path is a little "Harry Potter" but i once had a few lessons about 20 years ago from a pro who used a contraption which was attached to a wall and moved the grip in a fixed manner ( via swivels and hinges)... anyone else use one of these?
Trouble was backswing was the same path as downswing...but it got one to the top of the backswing in good order...
If so, and this next stage relies on a Gedanken experimental approach, if you could program the club to behave in this way ( individualised to the player) and the player just had to hang on and learn the way that their body needed to react/create this movement .... would this be a uselfu learning tool??
I know the concept of a floating club, repeatedly tracing out an optimum path is a little "Harry Potter" but i once had a few lessons about 20 years ago from a pro who used a contraption which was attached to a wall and moved the grip in a fixed manner ( via swivels and hinges)... anyone else use one of these?
Trouble was backswing was the same path as downswing...but it got one to the top of the backswing in good order...
