wpfisher
New
I was getting more of the "hot ball" issue, not clubs. Obviously a tour professional isn't playing off the rack clubs. Any amateur with enough money can get a club built any way he wants it too. Just like everything else in business, it boils down to money. If one equipment company has a ball that is conforming and goes a lot farther, then most companies have a similar ball. And if mutliple companies have a "legal juiced" ball, then one of them would be bound to sell it to the general public. And if one of them did this, then all the other companies would quickly follow suit. Now, if the tour balls that you say are different are NOT conforming, then thats a different issue. Obviously no equipment companies are going to sell a version of their ball that anyone could have tested to prove that its illegal.
So are you saying that all of the equipment companies have legal juiced balls, but NONE of them want to make all the extra profit that would come from marketing such a ball to the general public? Or are you saying that some/all tour players use nonconforming balls?
Again, let me state that these are the best players in the world and without this conspiracy theory, the are still the best. Tiger or Phil could probably shoot 7 under on any course with a $100 set from Walmart. This is just my opinion, but the reason that tour equipment is not for sale to the general public is due to the fact club manufacturers WANT you to believe the pros are playing the same exact stuff just with modified lofts, lies, shafts swing weights, etc. It would be insanely expensive to make clubs to the same playability and meticulous tolerances as the professionals. Besides, they think to a 10 or 15 handicap, the equipment will not make that much of a difference. Are the designs the same, yes. But the simple fact that tour issue clubs and balls are built in different factories and retail versions are made elsewhere sounds fishy. For instance, the some of the irons on tour are forged at the Muira or ENDO plants in Japan. The retail versions are forged elsewhere in the far east, in China and Thailand. That wouldnt be a big deal if the tolerances for the product were the same. The Muira and Endo plant throw out tons of clubs deemed unfit. The other plants do not practice this, instead building sets in the most practical and cost effective manor. Tha means you may get two 6 irons in a set, with one bent some and stamped with a 7 on it; I have heard of this happening before.
If it was commonly known that Golfsmith, Edwin Watts, etc could not give you what Tiger Woods, Adam Scott or Phil Mickelson plays, club manufacturers would have a problem. They would have to answer to this, and probably start building better, or atleast admit there are differences in the two, which all have denied untill today. That is why Callaway has come out with a Tour Authentic line, which is to fill this void in the market of people wanting legitimate tour issue equipment. Now is this tour authentic line the same as actual tour issue. I am still unsure about that. If it is and somehow prove it, Callaway can now sell their equipment for a more substantial profit to those seeking "better" equipment.
Last edited: