oh yea, Ben would have beat Tiger if....

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the debate will continue if one generation would have beat another. Maybe it should be the generation of equipment that is measured. Although Brandt found that newer equipment favored a better golf score compared to that of yesteryear, had he practiced with the older equipment with as much determination and focus as he had with current equipment and made the necessary adjustments, would he have played as well or even better? Maybe a slightly better score, but very doubtful he could do better on a consistent basis...

...and, the fact that Brandt can pick up any ancient set of clubs and fire a +5higher score without much practice, or if any at all, just tells you just how really good those guys are...


Clubs from the '80s bring round in 80s for Snedeker
By Steve DiMeglio, USA TODAY
SEA ISLAND, Ga. — Since world No. 1 Tiger Woods dominated Augusta National and the field in his record-setting 1997 Masters, the best professional golfers have labored to reach the bar he continually sets.
PGA Tour fitness trailers are fully occupied during tournament weeks. Offseason workout programs and extensive practice sessions have become customary. Experimentation with the latest equipment is constant.

Tour rookie Brandt Snedeker has a less-strenuous idea. "We have to start getting Tiger to use persimmon woods to keep up with him," Snedeker, 26, says. "Make him use old irons, too. And an old ball."

Snedeker arrived at this approach as a test subject for USA TODAY. The 6-1, 190-pound former Vanderbilt All-American enthusiastically agreed to play a round of golf with a set of previous-generation clubs.


GALLERY: How Snedeker fared with old clubs
TENNIS RACQUETS: Players appreciate wooden past
Obviously figuring his round would be made more difficult, Snedeker was nonetheless surprised how drastically golf had changed in just a matter of years.

"I don't know how to explain the sound" at impact with the old clubs and ball, he says. "It feels like the ball is getting stuck on the clubface. The old ball feels so soft, like a marshmallow."

His oversized metal woods, perimeter-weighted irons and state-of-the-art shafts and golf balls were pitted against woods actually made of wood; heavy, steel shafts and diminutive irons that were far less forgiving than today's advanced sets and balls last seen 20-25 years ago. Snedeker last hit a wood driver when he was 8 and then only in goofing with his dad's set.

The test came just hours after Snedeker secured his future by cashing in for $182,000 for his 12th-place tie at The Players Championship in May to earn his 2008 card.

Snedeker stepped back in time here by the Atlantic Ocean at the par-72, 6,687-yard Plantation Course where LPGA Hall of Famer Louise Suggs and PGA Tour star Davis Love III honed their games.

On a traditional course that unfolds among oak and cedar trees 300 to 500 years old and presents wide fairways and relatively flat greens, Snedeker experienced the game of golf as played by his predecessors.

Snedeker appreciated as he never did how good it feels to play with the modern ball — featuring titanium compounds, hybrid materials, softer shells and a more pressurized core — and his TaylorMade r7 driver. That club features moveable weights, inverted cone technology to promote higher ball velocity and an exotic shaft that matches the swing weight, flex point and kick point he prefers.

With his technology-driven equipment, much of it devised by those with aerospace and defense industry backgrounds, Snedeker shot 3-over 75 in 15-25 mph winds — five shots better than when he pulled out the older counterparts used by previous generations.

Making up ground on greens

Only a red-hot 1988 putter kept matters so close. With the old flat stick, Snedeker made birdies from 3, 4, 25 and 30 feet and holed many par-saving putts of 4-8 feet. With his up-to-date putter he made three birdies but had two three-putts and just missed on five other putts for birdie.

The rest of the round, however, was marked by a one-club difference in length between the old and new irons.

There was a 25-30 yard difference between drivers, 40-50 yards when he mis-hit the old driver. Mis-hits with his current equipment meant off-line landings of 5-10 yards; with the old clubs, as much as 50 yards off-line.

His good friend and agent Jimmy Johnston, 37, who played on the Tour in 1993 and 1997-98, got hold of the old equipment from representatives at Bridgestone and TaylorMade golf companies. Johnston also provided the three woods Snedeker used from the display he keeps on his office wall.

"I truly appreciate growing up in the generation that I did," Snedeker says, "because I don't think I would have grown up to be a pro golfer if I had to have played with the old stuff. It is so much different, so much tougher."

That's why Snedeker was so thankful the 80-year-old seaside layout he played isn't bursting with forced carries over water, 15-foot-deep bunkers and large mounds on the greens. Only seven holes bring water into play; his slightest mis-hits on three involving water resulted in two double bogeys and a bogey.

"On the toughest new courses, where you have to fly the ball 200 yards over water or unplayable areas, I might not break 90, 100 with the old equipment," he says.

"But the great equalizer is putting. That's what makes golf so great. Even if I was using 1960s equipment, if I'm putting great that day, I could still spank the best equipment in the world. If I don't make putts, I get killed."

Not that Snedeker wants to return to his youth, when, for the most part, he played with standard Chi Chi Rodriguez Special irons that featured a hitting surface half the size of his modern set and had a sweet spot the size of a dime instead of today's golf-ball-sized sweet spots.

"It makes me really appreciate the guys that came before me," Snedeker says of hitting the old clubs. "The way Bobby Jones played golf, Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer, Ben Hogan, Lee Trevino, Johnny Miller. Those guys were phenomenal.

"They had to be unbelievable ball strikers to hit the ball straight and as solid as they did."

As Trevino says about what might have been if his generation of pro golfers had competed with the advanced equipment: "The golf courses would have been too short."

Where's fairway?

Having used the old equipment for many years, Johnston knew what Snedeker was set to encounter. He often laughed — not at but with Snedeker — when the young pro hit shots with the older equipment.

The good-natured, friendly Snedeker, who tied the Torrey Pines North Course record this year with an 11-under 61 at the Buick Invitational in San Diego, realized his impending predicament on the practice range.

Snedeker broke out in laughter when he saw an age-worn short iron that had a strange number on it — 11, equivalent to today's pitching wedge. He also was taken aback by how his new driver dwarfed the Mizuno Pro 1 wood he had to use. He shook his head when he noticed the tiny sweet spots on the TaylorMade irons.

Just as shocking was the once top-of-the-line Rextar golf ball, which featured rubber-like balata-tree material that created a soft cover and yielded more spin. Conducting his own experiment, Snedeker hit one of the Rextar balls with his new sand wedge and shredded the cover of the ball.

"If we had (the new) golf ball in my day," Trevino says, "the best of us would have hit it 300 yards and Jack Nicklaus would have hit it 360."

On the first nine holes using the persimmon driver and the older ball, Snedeker could find the fairway just two of nine times. Each of his drives were low-flying projectiles that snapped to the left and went 200-220 yards — into high rough and behind trees.

On the first hole, he had 188 yards to the pin after his drive with the wood ended near a tree. With his contemporary TaylorMade r7 driver, he had 128 yards from the middle of the fairway to the pin.

On the par-4, 445-yard ninth, he had 200 yards to the pin after his drive with the wood ended up in rough; he had 144 yards from the middle of the fairway after using his modern driver.

"I'm seeing parts of this golf course I've never seen before," Snedeker said on the 12th hole. "I'm trying everything to keep the old driver on this planet."

He finally ditched his normal swing with the old driver and tried something that was supposed to produce a slight fade. By the time he reached the tee on the par-4, 409-yard 13th, he was pleading to the golf gods to find a fairway. He figured he needed a slice-swing to make it go straight.

"The biggest difference is the new ball doesn't curve as much anymore," Snedeker says. "It was a more precise game back then. The ball was spinning so much more, and it was so much harder to control vs. today's golf ball. The ball wanted to curve 20, 30, 40 yards.

"That's why you see guys hit the ball so much farther now, because we can go at it so much harder than they were able to do so back then. Back in the '60s and '70s and '80s, you couldn't go at it full bore because you could literally hit it 30, 40 yards off line.

"Every pro on the Tour, the biggest fear is hitting a low draw or snap hook," Snedeker adds. "Now the equipment is set up today where the ball won't spin enough to hit that draw. I have no fear. I really saw that today."

Trouble lurks

Somewhere Nicklaus is nodding in agreement. The Golden Bear and leading course builder has long said today's golf ball goes too far for the touring pro.

"Once we got into a wound golf ball and once we got into steel shafts, the game from basically the early 1930s until 1995 changed very little, and all the golf courses that were built needed very little adjustment to be able to handle any kind of a tournament," Nicklaus said earlier this year.

"From 1995 to today, it's a totally different game. It's certainly not that game that I played when I grew up. Not that it's a bad game, it's just totally different. I don't mean to be on my preaching stool again, but we need to do something where it brings the game back to where we don't have 17,000 obsolete golf courses in this country and only 20 courses for tournaments.

"Maybe I'm an old fuddy-duddy."

The irons Snedeker used in this experiment were certainly some old fuddy-duddies.

"The old irons take a much steeper divot. Today's irons are built with so much more bounce, which allows you to sweep the ball off the ground," Snedeker says. "I was taking huge divots today with the old stuff, and when you take steep divots, it affects your speed and affects the way the club works with the ball.

"The players in the past had to have great tempo to control the ball back then. It was a lot of fun to draw the ball 30 yards into a pin or cut the ball 30 yards into a pin. It proves the old guys were so much better course managers. They had to think their way around the golf course so much more because of the way the ball moved.

"You had to know every trouble spot," he says, "because the slightest mis-hit, you were in big trouble."

As Snedeker signed his scorecard, he had little trouble recalling every shot. He smiled at some of the recollections.

"Technology certainly makes the game easier for everyone to play, and that's great for golf," he says. "It makes the game easier for the pros to play. But don't think it's easy out there for us. The courses are getting longer and longer, the bunkers deeper, the rough deeper, the greens faster.

"Golf has always been a great game. Today it's still a great game, too, with all the new technology. I can't wait to see what comes next."

Rating old vs. new
How the golf clubs worked for PGA Tour rookie Brandt Snedeker and his comments:

Old Category New

Persimmon Mizuno Pro 1 250cc with steel shaft (circa 1985) Driver TaylorMade r7 425cc with 9.5-degree loft and Tour Preferred Rombax Technology shaft

Persimmon Mizuno World Master 3-wood (1982) Fairway woods r7 3-wood (15 degrees)

Oil Hardened Cleveland Classic 4-wood (1980) Rescue club TaylorMade Rescue club (19 degrees)

There was a 25- to 30-yard difference in driver vs. driver, 3-wood vs. 3-wood, 4-wood vs. rescue. "It took me seven, eight holes to figure out that I had to hit a big cut just to keep the ball in the fairway with the old stuff."

TaylorMade Tour Preferred (3- through 11-iron, 1981) Irons TaylorMade r7 TP with inverted cone technology and TruTemper Dynamic Gold shafts (3-PW)

There is at least a one-club difference in each. "With the new equipment, the ball jumps off the club and the ball reaches the pinnacle in height that you want right away. With the old stuff, it feels like the ball gets stuck on the club and it's so much harder to get the ball really high."

56-degree MacGregor Tourney RDX1 Sand Iron (1987 Wedges 54- and 60-degree Cleveland Tour Action 588 wedges

"When you have to get the ball in the air right away because of a tight pin, you can really see the difference with the new wedges. This is where technology really helps, with a 25-yard pitch over a mound to a tucked pin."

TaylorMade TPA XVIII (1988) Putter Odyssey White Hot XG Rossie

"If you're putting great, you can beat anybody with the old equipment I used."

Bridgestone Rextar Pro Model (1985) Ball Bridgestone Tour B330-S

"The new ball doesn't spin as much. You really have to adapt to the old ball because it spins so much. You really have to work the ball. With the new ball, I can just set it on the tee, take back my driver and hammer it."

By Steve DiMeglio, USA TODAY



Contributing: Jerry Potter








Find this article at:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/golf/pga/2007-07-12-oldclubs_N.htm
 
I recently heard a story Tom Stites recounted where he had a bunch of the Nike pros hit a set of Ben Hogan's irons, at Hogan's exact specs. He said that the only player able to hit the irons the way they're supposed to be hit was Tiger Woods.
 

Jim Kobylinski

Super Moderator
I recently heard a story Tom Stites recounted where he had a bunch of the Nike pros hit a set of Ben Hogan's irons, at Hogan's exact specs. He said that the only player able to hit the irons the way they're supposed to be hit was Tiger Woods.

blahblahblah...the only player who could probably hit Hogan's irons in HOGAN'S DAY was probably HIM.
 
I think it confirms how good he really is that he could get it around in only 5 more strokes with the old stuff, with no practice, fitting of the clubs, etc. Hot putter or not.
 
Someone should do a full STAT work-up on all of the old pros, compare it with todays players, and estimate how far they could it with todays clubs.

I think that Tiger beats Hogan. How do you handle a man with all of the tools from tee to green? Tiger would easily out putt him.

The article would have been better if they would have taken a guy like Couples or Vijay that grew up playing the old equipment and have them tell the differences.
 

Leek

New
Yet, according to the USGA, the average player's handicap is the same today as it was then. What do you think that means?
 
Yet, according to the USGA, the average player's handicap is the same today as it was then. What do you think that means?

Thanks to Tiger there are far more people playing today than there were in Hogans day.More golfers mean more new golfers,new golfers will always have high handicaps to start!

Golf instruction is improving,slowly,but ill also add that there must be way more low handicap golfers now than in Hogans day!
 
Have you watched those old wonderful world of golf tapes? greens with a stimp meter of about 7. Reduce the probability of a three putt to nearly zero, and see what happens to average scores.
 
<I think that Tiger beats Hogan. How do you handle a man with all of the tools from tee to green? Tiger would easily out putt him.>

I'd say Hogan hits more greens and closer to the pin than Tiger day in and day out. A lot of people think Hogan was a terrible putter. That is simply false. There are some stats on this I've seen...something like Hogan going months without a 3 putt.

No doubt with better clubs and ball Hogan & better courses, Hogan's scores would have averaged much lower. Hard to equalize all the parameters though; too many "what if's...".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top