An interesting thread, but...
...what everyone has missed here is the basic irrelevance of the individual PGA member to the PGA corporate type structure. The individual member (and his dues) comprises less than 12% of the national PGA's income. In other words, there is no reason to make ALL PGA members better instructors, as far as the national ass'n. is concerned. Can you spell...R -Y -D -E -R C -U -P??? Can you delve into all the real estate holdings owned by the PGA???
Sorry, but we PGA members are VERY small fish in a VERY BIG POND.![Frown :( :(]()
...what everyone has missed here is the basic irrelevance of the individual PGA member to the PGA corporate type structure. The individual member (and his dues) comprises less than 12% of the national PGA's income. In other words, there is no reason to make ALL PGA members better instructors, as far as the national ass'n. is concerned. Can you spell...R -Y -D -E -R C -U -P??? Can you delve into all the real estate holdings owned by the PGA???
Sorry, but we PGA members are VERY small fish in a VERY BIG POND.