S
SteveT
Guest
Forces aren't evident unless you know how to define, measure and calculate the forces. People like Nesbit, MacKenzie, mandrin, me, can intuitively back-calculate the forces being applied within the swing. IOW we can sense the forces objectively watching others and subjectively swinging ourselves.
The problem is correcting the application of forces within the swing. In my personal experience, I have to go back to basic golf-specific retraining before I can successfully apply new forces... and that's why I am skeptical when others claim they 'have it' in one session on the range... and I'm still athletic.
People who can 'talk' forces don't talk the same language as people who can only talk 'positions'. This is evident in the Anti-Summit experiment. I'm sure that Nesbit, MacKenzie, mandrin and me could have a very interesting discussion about golfswing dynamics (kinetics, kinematics and of course statics)... while the rest of the attendees would be in the dark.
What would also be obvious is that we in the brain trust would not be able to teach duffers anything scientific about their swing... because that is the realm of Brian, Jacobs, et al. What is fascinating is the use of TM and FS by teachers not really understanding the technicalities of those scientific measuring devices as it applies to kinetics and kinematics within the human body.... but things are changing/advancing quickly based on what Brian is doing.
Last edited: