Shaft Lag

Status
Not open for further replies.
quote:Originally posted by jim_0068

I highly doubt David plays with a 3* open driver.

Most pro's like the driver faces open to allow for the longer closing of the face during horizontal hinging.

The Cleveland rep said that Toms uses a 9.5 driver with a 3 deg open face. Perhaps you have more info than he does.

Hor Hinging lasts for only about 3/4" during the impact interval, how could an open face make it longer?
 

Garth

New
Hiro... you just blew my mind. I asked to see it, not to be a smartass, but because i truly didn't believe it was possible. Learn something new every day i guess. I guess my question now is, even with an overly stiff shaft, isn't that an indication of some throwaway? If the idea is to sustain lag until after impact, then I would think that the shaft would look loaded at impact no matter how stiff the shaft. (although i could see why it would be more difficult with it too-stiff)
 
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

quote:Originally posted by hiroshiro

Other things being equal, the softer the shaft, the more the head leads the shaft, leading to a greater dynamic loft at impact AND a more closed face. Therefore a SOFTER shaft tends to cause hooks, and a stiffer shaft tends to cause fades (and lower trajectories).

Tour pros tend to prefer open faces because their swings are ones that promote draws. (Is it true that most pros are Horizontal Hingers?) I sincerely doubt it is because their shafts are too stiff.

That has been the "wisdom" for yrs, but I always wondered why the opposite was true for me. It is interesting that when people first try the Whippy flexible shaft golf club trainer, they leave it out to the right, until they slow down considerably and get the kick timed.

Shaft experts(which I am not) have made the claim that most people, including tour pros, use shafts which are too stiff. There are some good reasons for this - a stiffer shaft feel crisper, if you can load it, and, according to Bob Burns, a shaft expert, a stiffer shaft gives more distance than a softer one for a given head speed.

This has been discussed at length here some time ago, so you might do a search.

MizunoJoe:

Regarding the Whippy Tempomaster, it is designed to be used with a "pure" Swing. Most people "add" some "hit" which bends the shaft and causes the face to be open at impact. I have the Whippy 5-iron and the shaft really doesn't have any "kick", at least when kick is defined as a spring-like restoring force.

Thank you for your views. I am not a shaft expert either, and didn't intend this thread to be one on shaft dynamics. When I have some time I will attempt to find the threads to you which referred.

hiro
 

Tom Bartlett

Administrator
Used to be thought that flexible shaft hits hooks and stiff hits slices. But, Club fitters will tell you differently. Try Henry Griffiths or Swing Sync. Stiffer shaft hits pulls and hooks.

Take it to the extreme. If you swing a garden hose with a club head on it, is the club head going to be in front of or behind the hands? Barring you don't do anything "funny".
 
quote:Originally posted by Garth

Hiro... you just blew my mind. I asked to see it, not to be a smartass, but because i truly didn't believe it was possible. Learn something new every day i guess. I guess my question now is, even with an overly stiff shaft, isn't that an indication of some throwaway? If the idea is to sustain lag until after impact, then I would think that the shaft would look loaded at impact no matter how stiff the shaft. (although i could see why it would be more difficult with it too-stiff)

Garth:

Excellent question. TGM leads one to believe it is possible to bring a loaded, prestressed clubshaft into impact. To most, that would imply that the clubshaft is bent backwards, the clubhead lagging behind the shaft. I have never seen such a photo, so I question whether or not it is possible in a full swing, and hence the genesis of this thread.

In a full swing - Swinging or Hitting - I believe the fictitious centrifugal force acting on the COG of the clubhead is high enough to override the lag pressure that causes the shaft to bend back. This results in the shaft being bent forward at impact even if lag pressure is maintained by the hands (i.e., no throwaway). The question is, is the shaft still considered to be loaded and prestressed at impact when it is in a bent-forward condition?

hiro
 

bbftx

New
hiro,
This won't directly answer your question about loading, but you might find this PhD research paper interesting.
"Understanding the Role of Shaft Stiffness in the Golf Swing," by Sasho MacKenzie, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Dec 2005.
http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12212005-163850/unrestricted/Thesis.pdf

This work is commendable in that the author compares his mathematical model of the golfer, club and swing with live golfer testing, noting where the results agree or don't. This is a great way to conduct scientific inquiry on the golf swing. His conclusions therefore have more validity than those from simplified mathematical models alone.

He also mentions conclusions and limitations of some of the earlier research studies of shaft behavior, which is quite interesting.

He covers lots of ground here, including shaft lead/lag, and droop, as well as the influence of stiffness on clubhead velocity at impact.

But he does make an interesting summary of the lead/lag issue:
"Two additional points should be made regarding the results from the highspeed video data. First, with the exception of the left-handed golfer [swinging a right-handed club left-handed, so it's not representative of a real golf shot], every swing with every club resulted in a lead deflection at impact, as did the simulation results."
 

Burner

New
quote:Originally posted by hiroshiro

One of the tenets of TGM is maintaining lag pressure through impact and beyond. It appears as if some believe that this is manifested by the clubshaft being stressed and bowing back away from the target (the shaft leading the clubhead) throughout the down stroke and through impact. However, just about every image I have seen taken by high speed cameras shows that the shaft is straight or bowed forward just prior to impact. (The clubhead may still be behind the hands, though.) This is explained as centrifugal force acting on the center of gravity of the clubhead which is often (and especially with woods) further back than the shaft axis.

I am not questioning that one should endeavour to "sustain the lag" through impact, or that it is possible to maintain pressure again PP#3 throughout the down stroke. I would, however, like to solicit the learned forum members' opinion whether sustaining the lag is manifested by the shaft bending backwards throughout the downstroke until the moment just prior to impact. (Clearly impact itself will cause the shaft to appear to bend back, but this is not what I am referring to.)
True Temper, in the link provided by bbftx, explains this phenomenon thus:-

quote:
However, just prior to impact the golfer has typically decreased or ceased acceleration (not motion) of the club. The shaft then springs back in the other direction and overshoots, resulting in the head leading at impact.

therefore it is necessary to sustain the lag by dragging your wet mop right through to low point. Steady, constant driving pressure in order to obviate any clubshaft deceleration.
 
quote:Originally posted by Burner

quote:Originally posted by hiroshiro

One of the tenets of TGM is maintaining lag pressure through impact and beyond. It appears as if some believe that this is manifested by the clubshaft being stressed and bowing back away from the target (the shaft leading the clubhead) throughout the down stroke and through impact. However, just about every image I have seen taken by high speed cameras shows that the shaft is straight or bowed forward just prior to impact. (The clubhead may still be behind the hands, though.) This is explained as centrifugal force acting on the center of gravity of the clubhead which is often (and especially with woods) further back than the shaft axis.

I am not questioning that one should endeavour to "sustain the lag" through impact, or that it is possible to maintain pressure again PP#3 throughout the down stroke. I would, however, like to solicit the learned forum members' opinion whether sustaining the lag is manifested by the shaft bending backwards throughout the downstroke until the moment just prior to impact. (Clearly impact itself will cause the shaft to appear to bend back, but this is not what I am referring to.)
True Temper, in the link provided by bbftx, explains this phenomenon thus:-

quote:
However, just prior to impact the golfer has typically decreased or ceased acceleration (not motion) of the club. The shaft then springs back in the other direction and overshoots, resulting in the head leading at impact.

therefore it is necessary to sustain the lag by dragging your wet mop right through to low point. Steady, constant driving pressure in order to obviate any clubshaft deceleration.

Burner:

Thank you for your reply.

In your opinion, do you feel that in a full swing, by "dragging your wet mop right through to low point" that one can maintain the lag until the point of impact in a way that is manifested by the shaft bending backwards? And if you do believe this, can you direct me to any photos displaying this?

Thanks.

hiro
 
quote:Originally posted by bbftx

hiro,
This won't directly answer your question about loading, but you might find this PhD research paper interesting.
"Understanding the Role of Shaft Stiffness in the Golf Swing," by Sasho MacKenzie, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Dec 2005.
http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12212005-163850/unrestricted/Thesis.pdf

This work is commendable in that the author compares his mathematical model of the golfer, club and swing with live golfer testing, noting where the results agree or don't. This is a great way to conduct scientific inquiry on the golf swing. His conclusions therefore have more validity than those from simplified mathematical models alone.

He also mentions conclusions and limitations of some of the earlier research studies of shaft behavior, which is quite interesting.

He covers lots of ground here, including shaft lead/lag, and droop, as well as the influence of stiffness on clubhead velocity at impact.

But he does make an interesting summary of the lead/lag issue:
"Two additional points should be made regarding the results from the highspeed video data. First, with the exception of the left-handed golfer [swinging a right-handed club left-handed, so it's not representative of a real golf shot], every swing with every club resulted in a lead deflection at impact, as did the simulation results."

bbftx:

Thank you very much for the most interesting link. I was unaware of this paper, and will read it in depth if my 15-month old allows it (he is tugging on my arm as I type this).

The last line of your post was intriguing. If the left-hander's phenomenon is a valid one, perhaps we all need to buy the opposite-handed clubs and swing them upside down the way Mac O'Grady is purported to be proficient at ;).

hiro
 

Burner

New
quote:
originally posted by hiroshiro

Burner:

Thank you for your reply.

In your opinion, do you feel that in a full swing, by "dragging your wet mop right through to low point" that one can maintain the lag until the point of impact in a way that is manifested by the shaft bending backwards?
Thanks.hiro

Yes.

quote:
originally posted by hiroshiro

And if you do believe this, can you direct me to any photos displaying this?
Thanks.hiro

Sorry, I have seen such photographs but did not stored them for future reference.
 
So unless someone comes up with some new evidence, i think it's safe to say that essentially all golfers have a forward bending shaft at impact. In fact, varying the amount of forward bend is, besides feel and weight, the greatest way that shaft design can produce a change in ball flight.

Hiro that's a very interesting question. when the "line of pull" passes the hands, can you still feel the #3pp? Is there still a pull? Can you truly sustain the lag pressure with a forward deflecting shaft? How long does the shaft actually have a forward bend? Does is return to straight so quickly that any potential loss of the #3pp is overiden by impact? hmmm.

Someone on the Wishon forum built a "club" without the clubhead cog rearward of the shaft. would be interesting to have a swing of a club like that.
 
quote:Originally posted by Burner

Sorry, I have seen such photographs but did not stored them for future reference.

Burner, if you do come across these again, please post them. I would be VERY interested in seeing them.

hiro
 
quote:Originally posted by hiroshiro

quote:Originally posted by nevermind

I'm with hiroshiro. Sustaining the lag pressure does not manifest itself in a backward bent shaft at impact. I don't you can successfully argue against that.
Nevermind:

Do you feel it is possible to maintain lag pressure throughout the downstroke until impact despite having a shaft that is bending forward? This is really the crux of what I'm interested in.

hiro
hiroshiro, it might be useful to do the following very simple thought experiment, viewing a down swing somewhat prior and through impact.

Consider the angular velocity of the club handle of a completely rigid shaft to one with a small additional motion of the club head due to flexing of the shaft.

It is quite reasonable to assume that the angular velocity of the club handle in both cases will be the same, for equal conditions.

In other words one can consider the motion of the club handle to be virtually decoupled from the small motion, due to flexing, of the club head.

Hence, I do feel that one can maintain lag pressure prior to and through impact despite the fact that the shaft might bend forward.

The word ‘kick’ is misleading as it invokes a spring like action. The shaft in the hands of a golfer is really overdamped and can’t oscillate during a golf swing.

Too often one uses a shaft clamped in a vise as starting point which is leading one away from the reality of a golf swing.
 
quote:Originally posted by brianman

No matter what the clubhead is doing to the head, the grip end is still stressed by the golfer.
Brian, what a pleasure. Posting, I noticed that this time we are perfectly in sync. Oh well, truly great spirits think alike. :D
 
Brian, mandrin:

Thank you for your replies. I will sleep better tonight with the knowledge that you two are in harmony on this issue.:D

Cheers!

hiro
 
quote:Originally posted by bbftx

hiro,
This won't directly answer your question about loading, but you might find this PhD research paper interesting.
"Understanding the Role of Shaft Stiffness in the Golf Swing," by Sasho MacKenzie, Univ. of Saskatchewan, Dec 2005.
http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-12212005-163850/unrestricted/Thesis.pdf

This work is commendable in that the author compares his mathematical model of the golfer, club and swing with live golfer testing, noting where the results agree or don't. This is a great way to conduct scientific inquiry on the golf swing. His conclusions therefore have more validity than those from simplified mathematical models alone.

He also mentions conclusions and limitations of some of the earlier research studies of shaft behavior, which is quite interesting.

He covers lots of ground here, including shaft lead/lag, and droop, as well as the influence of stiffness on clubhead velocity at impact.

But he does make an interesting summary of the lead/lag issue:
"Two additional points should be made regarding the results from the highspeed video data. First, with the exception of the left-handed golfer [swinging a right-handed club left-handed, so it's not representative of a real golf shot], every swing with every club resulted in a lead deflection at impact, as did the simulation results."

bbftx:

Thanks again for the link. I only had time to skim the paper, but nevertheless found it very interesting. I am also heartened by the fact that the conclusions drawn by the author support my own clubfitting philosophy.

hiro
 
mandrin,

Unless the shaft is made of rebar, the shaft will kick at least once during the downswing and sometimes twice.
 
quote:Originally posted by MizunoJoe

mandrin,

Unless the shaft is made of rebar, the shaft will kick at least once during the downswing and sometimes twice.
MizunoJoe,

Flexing of a particular shaft is mainly determined by :

(1) Torque/force time history as applied with the hands.

(2) Centrifugal force acting on COM of the clubhead.

First part of downswing ruled by (1), second part by both (1) and (2).

It is known that the force/torque time history varies considerably.

Flexing behaviour of shaft will hence accordingly be quite unique.

You could probably also throw in the effect air drag,

but forget the idea of a loaded shaft kicking. [8D]
 
quote:Originally posted by mandrin


forget the idea of a loaded shaft kicking.

mandrin,

A shaft kicks when the lagging clubhead starts overtaking the shaft. Do you think that all the photos of this phenomenon are illusions? Is all that launch monitor data a hoax? Do me a favor - go to the bombsquad forum and make that statement - now that would be fun to read! [:p]
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top