mgranato
New
I think by now we're all aware of the cons of too negative an AA. However, I don't recall much talk about the other side of the scale. Are there cons with AA numbers in the shallow end of the pool, say 2 degrees or less?
I think by now we're all aware of the '09 PGA Tour averages for AA. Those seem like "safe" averages to model and compare our own AA numbers to, but how ideal are those numbers? Obviously, some really good players are shallower than those average, and some are steeper. The Tour average for the driver is slowly working its way toward the positive, and it's known that the "optimal" AA for that club is not the '09 Tour averages. So... is there an optimal AA for the shots played off the ground? Is it possibly shallower than the '09 averages? Have any of the scientist done any modeling on the subject?
I think by now we're all aware my limitations so any help in this area is greatly appreciated.![Smile :) :)]()
I think by now we're all aware of the '09 PGA Tour averages for AA. Those seem like "safe" averages to model and compare our own AA numbers to, but how ideal are those numbers? Obviously, some really good players are shallower than those average, and some are steeper. The Tour average for the driver is slowly working its way toward the positive, and it's known that the "optimal" AA for that club is not the '09 Tour averages. So... is there an optimal AA for the shots played off the ground? Is it possibly shallower than the '09 averages? Have any of the scientist done any modeling on the subject?
I think by now we're all aware my limitations so any help in this area is greatly appreciated.