Well, we can call it whatever we want, but there is a stronger correlation and practical application for the angular differential along the plane ("3D Spin Loft"), since this is the number that would actually be involved in the function for the amount of spin generated.
I think Brian's statement (again, which I now agree with - too bad it's been removed) was something along the lines of, "a ball hit with a 20 deg face, -5 AoA, and zeroed out path/face will have more compression/less spin loft than a ball that's hit with the same vertical components (20 deg face and -5 AoA), but has a face aimed
off the path (not zeroed-out/horizontal differential). Which makes sense because there is now a greater angular difference between the face and path.
More 3D (Vertical & Horizontal) differential = more spin loft = less compression.
If this (3D Spin Loft) is a new term, do I get to name it myself, like a new star or dinosaur? How about "Strong Loft?"
I understand that Trackman may name it one thing or another, but it's the concept (rather than the semantics) that I'm more interested in.