Good ideas, but......
As a teacher-researcher-content provider, I am forever going through the process of learning a "new swing."
I have subjected myself to the "Pull Back, Run Up & Jump" along with elements of baby fade and other patterns for the last month or so.
On the range, I can demonstrate and on video, I am doing it as advertised.
On the golf course....?
Yesterday, I played a course in Dayton, Ohio with Lindsay Gahm, as she got a practice round in for the US Am qualifier there on Thursday.
I warmed up like a low-speed tour player, and went out and birdied the first hole. Hit some impressive shots, some goofy shots, and some poor shots for the next few holes.
As we got close to the back nine, I was in my "state of realization" that although I have discovered/uncovered an important piece of the golf swing that will be useful for many, it would be anything that I could do to play my best.
Sensing a little sleep-walking through the round by Lindsay, I challenged her to a $1 nine-hole death match at stroke play.
Lindsay is the fourth Gahm child, the little sis of three older, very athletic brothers, and the daughter of a two-sport D1 college athlete.
She can "compete" with the best of them, and trash talk with Ray Lewis if need be.
So it was on like Donkey Kong.
I went to Pattern 13 with the driver except for one left to right tee shot, and NHA2 for everything else.
I lipped in two par putts on 17 and 18 to nip Lindsay in a great match that featured 5 birdies, by one stroke.
Moral of the story:
You gotta play with what works for you.
Under the gun, NHA2 never lets me down.
So, you can "look good on video" or "look good on TrackMan" and I'll always take the latter, 'cuz it looks better on the scorecard.