The Crossroads.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brian Manzella

Administrator
From a post of mine on—like they say—another site. ;)

Leo,

I don't think you are going to get a legit discussion on this. (pivot tripod center vs. base of the neck center)

(they cry) Centered Arc!

NO kidding. Who in the heck is saying the POST should move from release point THROUGH the follow-through?

Not me.

You see "Golfing Machine" fans, Leo "Tongzilla" was an attendee at the Canton School.

He is a young man.

He is tall and lean.

He is smart.

and........he has physical ability.

When he would dutifully attempt the "Pivot Tripod Center" with his head precisely between his feet, he would hit a weak slice with about a 200-210 carry......

....tops!

and In my opinion—doing this "Pivot Tripod Center" concept—Leo had a top-of-the-backstroke position that, was for all practical purposes, a reverse pivot.

He just didn't look 'golf like' at the top of the swing....to me....after 23 years of teaching everyone from hacker to Ryder Cupper.

So, when Leo worked with me, I put him in the top of the backswing position that looked like a GOLFER...to me...after giving 23 thousand golf lessons.

The students who were nearby confirmed—Leo looked more like a golfer.

Why?

Because the 5 guys who were watching had looked at golf on TV for 23 thousand hours collectively.....

and Leo DID look more like a golfer.

But, I digress...

Position Golf! The faithful cries!

Nope.

You see, I couldn't give a rat's rear end WHAT Leo LOOKED like, I knew that the REAL problem was Leo had to work WAY TO HARD to get his right shoulder on plane on the downstroke from the "Pivot Tripod Center" concept backswing.

From the Manzella "maiiiii.....waaaaayyyyy" backswing, Leo hit a STRONG 240-250 carry draw.

Great right?

Nope.

Leo was sad,

Leo—a great student and student of G.O.L.F.—didn't want to hit these TOUR-like shots with a backswing that violated any 'rules of G.O.L.F.'

I brought Ben Doyle over to look at Leo's backswing, Ben Loved the Manzella-"maiiiii.....waaaaayyyyy" backswing. He then posed Leo in a very similar—if not exact—top of the backstroke position.

Yet, Leo was sad.

So, Leo left the school being able to hit it pure as snow with the Manzella-"maiiiii.....waaaaayyyyy" backswing or 30 yards shorter and 20 yards to the right with a "Pivot Tripod Center" concept backswing.

He has then talked to some other noted teachers, like Bobby Schaffer, who confirmed what I am saying, that the "Pivot Tripod Center" concept backswing, is just that—a concept. One way to skin a cat. But NOT the only way.

Leo still would like some nice debate on what works better in the real world, but
all he gets is Frank Sinatra songs.

So, sports fans, we sit at a place called the crossroads, looking dead in the eye of another concept—branding.

Lynn is positioning himself as the ultimate straight out of Homer Kelley's mouth teacher on planet earth, ready to revolutionize golf with the "Pivot Tripod Center" concept backswing and the "Right Forearm Takeaway."He has done a great job with this positioning, and a GREAT job getting Homer's little-known concepts some well-deserved light. He is a super motivator, a charming large group indoor presenter, and like Ben Doyle says "He really knows the book."

Brian Manzella—that would be me—just wants to be the best teacher on the planet, and take over (revolutionize) golf by helping the most players play better and the most teachers teach better, by using science, like—but not exclusively—The Golfing Machine, to assist the teacher in finding a pattern that the student can produce the lowest scores with. Letting "The Imperatives Dictate the components." My brand is simply this—I can get you to do it and I can get you to understand it, but the IT will be, whatever works AS LONG AS IT PRODUCES A STRAIGHT PLANE LINE, CLUBHEAD LAG and CONTROLS THE CLUBFACE WITH HINGE ACTION.

In my opinion—yes "maiiiii.....waaaaayyyyy" opinion—the golf world is better for having us both.

And Leo need to turn around the base of his neck.;)
 

LSH

New
quote:Originally posted by brianman

From a post of mine on—like they say—another site.

Brian Manzella—that would be me—just wants to be the best teacher on the planet, and take over (revolutionize) golf by helping the most players play better and the most teachers teach better, by using science, like—but not exclusively—The Golfing Machine, to assist the teacher in finding a pattern that the student can produce the lowest scores with. Letting "The Imperatives Dictate the components." My brand is simply this—I can get you to do it and I can get you to understand it, but the IT will be, whatever works AS LONG AS IT PRODUCES A STRAIGHT PLANE LINE, CLUBHEAD LAG and CONTROLS THE CLUBFACE WITH HINGE ACTION.

Brian
This sound like what I am looking for. I want someone to show me what I need to do and how to do it. Then hopefully I'll be able to understand and do it to give myself an easy to repeat stroke.

Steve
 
Good surprise post Brian...it's given me a slight heart attack.

My head only moves very slightly on the backstroke now (about 1 inch) -- not a big sway like David Toms. You can hardly notice it. It used to move zero inches. But that makes all the difference.

I regularly hit drives over 300 yards (300 carry) with the pattern I'm using now, don't I oztrainee? ;) I'll try and put a face on view online...
 

rundmc

Banned
quote:Originally posted by tongzilla

Good surprise post Brian...it's given me a slight heart attack.

My head only moves very slightly on the backstroke now (about 1 inch) -- not a big sway like David Toms. You can hardly notice it. It used to move zero inches. But that makes all the difference.

I regularly hit drives over 300 yards (300 carry) with the pattern I'm using now, don't I oztrainee? ;) I'll try and put a face on view online...

Tong can you let us know what you changed to get from a 210 yard carry to 300? AWSOME!
 
quote:Originally posted by tongzilla

My head only moves very slightly on the backstroke now (about 1 inch) -- not a big sway like David Toms. You can hardly notice it. It used to move zero inches. But that makes all the difference.

I regularly hit drives over 300 yards (300 carry) with the pattern I'm using now

Forgive me for being skeptical about this - going from 260 yds to 300 yds carry translates to an increase in head speed from about 105 mph to one of over 120. Over 105 mph, increases in head speed are obtained in very small increments, if at all.
 
quote:Originally posted by rundmc



Tong can you let us know what you changed to get from a 210 yard carry to 300? AWSOME!

I never hit 210 yard drives even before Canton and Brian KNOWS that. He was trying to make a point. Which was the fact that I am hitting it flusher now...point made.
 
I've seen a video of Tong's swing....to me, it looked like it definately could produce 250 yards of carry. Without a doubt.

....BTW, I think (correct me if I'm wrong Tong) that swing vid WAS after the "3 G.O.L.F. Guys" school.....

....

BTW....I have to agree with Brian here....

Whatever works better. Try both though for sure....for a while....no harm in that.

....if it turns out that you hit it better with a Stationary Head.....so be it. Homer was right- great.

And if you hit it better w/ a head that moves laterally a touch (and I'm sure it happens, as Brian has attested to from all his teaching experience), then so be it.

....big deal.

Try both....bt strive for a Stationary Head....and if it's not meant to be.....then there's no need to try and force things IMO.

Homer said himself that his book is not a "my way" book.....he's only laid out general guidelines.....I dunno what all the controversy is about, really.

I'm sure Lynn knows that....I'm sure Brian knows that.....
 
I agree - watching video of pros shows this very clearly - the head moves - I mean I know PGA tour players cld really be so much better with the right teacher ;) - they have so much to learn :D - yeah right

as to the idea of trying both

what % of people who takes lessons have the resources - time, money, camera, time to analyse the video output etc etc

very few I wld suggest

sometimes we need to stop and think abt things before we become guinea pigs for golf teachers

i have found along the way that when they get challenged by a knowledgeable person - they use the try both ways come back when bluffing etc does not work

I saw a post that said hit 10,000 pitches to ingrain FLW etc - I mean come on - do these people have a life (thats after all the other stuff they have to do - dowells, flashlights etc etc etc)

anyway I had better stop there
 

rundmc

Banned
quote:Originally posted by tongzilla

quote:Originally posted by rundmc



Tong can you let us know what you changed to get from a 210 yard carry to 300? AWSOME!

I never hit 210 yard drives even before Canton and Brian KNOWS that. He was trying to make a point. Which was the fact that I am hitting it flusher now...point made.
Gotcha. I just read his post. Never seen your move. Hope I didn't offend. Was certainly not my intent. Was the base of the neck as pivot center the only thing you changed to get increased "POP?" Or were their other adjustments?

Regards,

R
 
quote:Originally posted by cjgolf


I agree - watching video of pros shows this very clearly - the head moves - I mean I know PGA tour players cld really be so much better with the right teacher ;) - they have so much to learn :D - yeah right

Tiger STILL wants to get better. I just think there's always room for improvement. ALWAYS.....unless your name is Ben Hogan or Moe Norman....and even then.....they could still prolly find something to imporve upon.

You have to shave strokes wherever you can.....a 1/4 of a stroke would be significant at that level.

quote:as to the idea of trying both

what % of people who takes lessons have the resources - time, money, camera, time to analyse the video output etc etc

very few I wld suggest

sometimes we need to stop and think abt things before we become guinea pigs for golf teachers

Uh.....you don't experiment? (I'm not talking about drugs either) At all? Not at all?

...

Just try both...

You don't need resources...or an instructor....or a camera....or anything else....well maybe a reflection (i.e. mirror) would help.

Play for a while moving your head.....play for a while with a still head.

See how you hit it.

It's not a hard concept to understand really.

quote:i have found along the way that when they get challenged by a knowledgeable person - they use the try both ways come back when bluffing etc does not work

That doesn't make sense.
 
Jit was an old colored man who used to work for my grandaddy. Jit was totally deaf, and rarely ever talked. One day while riding shotgun with my grandad in an old grain truck that had no windshield, a bird flew into the cab and hit my grandad square in the forehead at 45 mph. Jit looked over at Samuel Way, Sr and muttered loudly, " Gatt Dayumm."

I muttered the same to myself after reading this thread. No one on this site is as good as they are going to be as a result.

Digest.
 
I can confirm what Brian has said about Tongzilla, as I too was at Canton. Leo is tall athletic guy and could hit the ball well before Brian started working with him. Being one of the five guys watching, Brian placed Leo in a much more athletic position and it appeared to me that Leo could get extended into impact. As Brian said he looked much more like a golfer. I have no doubt that Leo can knock the he$% out of the ball.

I was a pure hitter before going to Canton and have slowly worked towards being a swinger after working with Brian. I believe it was his opinion that I could be a very solid angled hinge swinger. It's taken time to adjust to utilizing centrifugal force as opposed to muscle but it's beginning to sink in.

Everyone at the school did a great job, but it was obvious to me, that Brian's gift is taking the complex terminology and breaking it down into layman's terms. Leo is extremely knowledgeable regarding the golfing machine, but not all of us(including me) are.

I need visuals and Brian's "shake the sugar" and "throw the drunk off my back" were effective for me..


I can tell you today I both hit and swung(played two balls for nine) my best drives swinging were consistently 20-25 yards longer than my best drives hitting, so I believe Brian knew what he was talking about.
 
I'll vouch for Tongzilla, T-ball and Brian. I was also one of the people around Tongzilla when he was working with Brian. Prior to Brian working with him, Tongzilla could hit the ball a long way, driver carry was well past 210. After Brian worked with Tongzila, it looked like he was in a more athletic position at the top and he did carry the ball much further. However, Tonzilla said he was going to work with this concept more because he felt like he was swaying off the ball.

Tongzilla has encyclopedic knowledge of the yellow book and has done a great job of building his golf swing. He has a lot of physical gifts for the game and an awesome swing in the mold of MikeSTLOC.
 
"It's not a hard concept to understand really."

its not a concept - its a fact

pros move there head

i think most people on here have a lot of other things they can focus on to get better - assuming of course that is the aim - applying Pareto's law wld probably have us, including Hogan focussing on something other than head movement

not that Hogan or probably any other pro cares what we think on here :D

see Brian's post re not playing around with David Tom's

not a dig at u Birdie - just happened to reply to yr post

to his credit Brian basically said (in a post the other week) that in the real world of teaching ie at the coal face - things are different

"You don't need resources...or an instructor....or a camera....or anything else....well maybe a reflection (i.e. mirror) would help.

Play for a while moving your head.....play for a while with a still head."

Birdie - time is a resource

mirrors etc is not hitting balls - to have any reasonable conclusion for an individual they wld have to hit many balls under playing conditions (to be statistically valid that is) and know what they did (feel aint real TGM concept) - so just how wld one know without other resources

a shot with a good outcome does not of itself prove anything as the head may or may not move but there may have been a compensating move/s
 

Brian Manzella

Administrator
Here are a couple more TRUE STORIES to chew on guys and girls....

Jimmy Self—from about 1977 to 1987—gave more golf lessons in a ten year period than ANYONE EVER. No contest.

Jimmy, who was Mike Finney's teacher when he was young, was the "David Leadbetter" of New Orleans during the above mentioned time.

Let me start by saying he is a dear friend and was a friendly rival for years.

Jimmy taught the EXACT SAME PATTERN to everyone. Hooker, Slicer, Shanker. Tour Star or wannabe, little old lady or very young boy.

In TGM terms, here it is:

STRONG SINGLE ACTION GRIP
STANDARD ADDRESS
RIGHT FOREARM TAKEAWAY
NO PLANE SHIFT-TURNED SHOULDER PLANE
PIVOT TRIPOD CENTER WITH HEAD with the head, as he would say, "Balanced over the ball." We would say precisely between the feet.
SLIGHTLY BENT TO BENT LEFT WRIST AT THE TOP
CIRCLE DELIVERY PATH
ADDRESS IMPACT
DELAYED HIP ACTION

From what you might deduce from this—and Jimmy's full lesson book—he should have been very successful.
The only funny stuff in the pattern is the address impact (and maybe the circle delivery path).

If you had talent, Like MikeSTLOC or Stan Stopa, and DIDN'T EXACTLY DO AS TOLD, he could 'help' you.

But, if you had talent—like Jimmy students Archie Manning (yes that Acrhie) and Robert Frosch (no not the poet), and you really did as Jimmy told you (or more accurately 'posed' you), you could look like a buffon. Archie had the worst swing of any good athlete ever (Barkley's looks better) and Robert Frosch and Liz Butera looked like a busted disk waiting to happen.

Wait! I thought if your head was in the middle of your feet and still throughout the swing—like 98.7% of all Jimmy's students, and you had a right forearm pickup—like 96.2% of all Jimmy's students, then, well, you ought to be able to play a little, right?

Ah,....nope.

Without educated hands for better players and without a twistaway type backswing for slicers, Jimmy got VERY LITTLE improvement from his teaching most players—except for the fact that he did get them pumped up mentally and had 'em hit 500 balls a day.

Before I taught Nakia Davis to have one of the world's prettiest swings ever, Jimmy had her right forearm PARALLEL to the ground at impact.

It wasn't really throwaway, it was SHOVEaway.

You see folks, there are next to NO magic pills in this game.

This stupid swing of mine that plays beneath my posts, is really not "my" swing at all. It is me doing my best to do the tripod and a sequenced release and a right forearm pickup.

[the lag is always there ;)]

I could hit it on the range ok with this pattern, but, I couldn't play a lick with it on the course.

When Mike Finney posts all the new video on my new site (any day now), we will put ALL the Brian Manzella patterns we can.

Trust me, the one that LOOKS the worse, produced my best one year of golf. With personal bests on the following favorite New Orleans courses, some of them now gone:

City Park South (Par 68) - 59
City Park North (Par 70) - 64
Ponchartrain Park (Par 72) - 66
Audubon Park (Par 68) - 63

This was the THESIS of my talk at the Golfing Machine Summit:

Do what works best for the student

This is MY MOTTO, my POSITIONING and my BRAND.

I don't consider Homer's quote ("through the head pivot center is recomended but not at all mandatory"), to be—like Ben Doyle says—"Whiskey talk."

I ABSOLUTELY TEACH GOLFER TO HAVE A PERFECTLY STILL 'BETWEEN THE FEET' HEAD WITH A RIGHT FOREARM PICKUP all the time...

...just not all OF the time ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top