Tiger Article with Manzella Analysis and Commentary

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brian Manzella said:
Tell ya'll?

Nah.

But, no doubt, I'd fix him so good he might never lose.

A couple of "non-secret" things:

#1. Go back to 1997 Putting Pattern

#2. Put the REAL stinger back in use

Yup...basically make him "Hit" the Stinger..

I told you the Stallion is smarter than the average bear!!!!
 

daz

New
Reverse Swivel ?

Interesting thread guys.

What has Tiger changed in his putting stroke? Its not something Ive monitored over the years, been more interested in his swhit.

I read Haneys book years ago and its very mixed up and the photos of him demonstrating it are terrible. Who would want Mark OMeara as a model?.

Anyone know what Haney is trying to achieve with this reverse swivel thing? Certainly looks bizarre and seems to pre-occupy Tiger on the Tee when he should be zoning in on the target.

I dont believe Phil uses any of Peltz's mechanical ideas in his short game he's far too natural for that. Maybe its just a finiancial arrangement?
 
Tiger has added some wrist movement to his stroke. Brian mentioned it in a couple of pod casts (when is the next one of them BTW?).
 

Erik_K

New
daz said:
Interesting thread guys.

What has Tiger changed in his putting stroke? Its not something Ive monitored over the years, been more interested in his swhit.

I read Haneys book years ago and its very mixed up and the photos of him demonstrating it are terrible. Who would want Mark OMeara as a model?.

Anyone know what Haney is trying to achieve with this reverse swivel thing? Certainly looks bizarre and seems to pre-occupy Tiger on the Tee when he should be zoning in on the target.

I dont believe Phil uses any of Peltz's mechanical ideas in his short game he's far too natural for that. Maybe its just a finiancial arrangement?

Phil's always had a great short game. He surely doesn't practice what Pelz teaches. What he got from Pelz, supposedly, is all kids of useful stats about his short game. I don't know what exactly, but Pelz has a knack for analyzing some stuff that most find very minute and seemingly insignifcant. But perhaps Phil used some of that stuff to his advantage, or maybe Pelz just gave Phil some short game drills to work on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top