mgranato
New
Some food for thought and perspective...
Given the course yardage, I'm guessing there were a lot of approaches from 100-125 yards. The best player on Tour from that yardage averages hitting it to 16’, and the worst player from that range hits it to 26’. Not bad, right?
The best putter on Tour from 15’-20’ only makes 27% of his looks, and the worst makes 8%. The corresponding numbers from 20’-25’ (where your guy said most of his were from) are 22% and 2% respectively.
Now the kick in the plums… the guy who hits it to a Tour best 16’ is nowhere close to being the best putter from that distance, making just 13%. And the guy who is the Tour best putter from 15’-20’ doesn’t hit it inside 20’ from those distances.
Maybe the best way to define golf is calling it a game of wanting what you don't have.![Roll eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:]()
As far as the leaving-too-many-short-itis goes, I suffered from that disease for a long time. Going the route of "just be more aggressive" never worked for me. Ultimately realizing that aggressiveness doesn't fix a speed issue like skinny jeans won't fit a gut issue. Putting at the wrong speed is putting at the wrong speed. Although better than leaving one short, aggressively sending one by and "shrinking" the hole just slightly improves the odds.
Try playing a few rounds with "pull back" rules. Any putt from 30' and in that doesn't get past the lip of the hole gets pulled back 1 additional putter length. Any put that goes past the hole and past whatever comfort level you subscribe to (6", 12", 17", etc.) gets pulled back away from the hole 1 additional putter length. A couple rounds of this (especially with a few nickels riding on the outcome) will reveal which tendencies you have and from what putts.
Putting with good speed is a perishable skill.
Given the course yardage, I'm guessing there were a lot of approaches from 100-125 yards. The best player on Tour from that yardage averages hitting it to 16’, and the worst player from that range hits it to 26’. Not bad, right?
The best putter on Tour from 15’-20’ only makes 27% of his looks, and the worst makes 8%. The corresponding numbers from 20’-25’ (where your guy said most of his were from) are 22% and 2% respectively.
Now the kick in the plums… the guy who hits it to a Tour best 16’ is nowhere close to being the best putter from that distance, making just 13%. And the guy who is the Tour best putter from 15’-20’ doesn’t hit it inside 20’ from those distances.
Maybe the best way to define golf is calling it a game of wanting what you don't have.
As far as the leaving-too-many-short-itis goes, I suffered from that disease for a long time. Going the route of "just be more aggressive" never worked for me. Ultimately realizing that aggressiveness doesn't fix a speed issue like skinny jeans won't fit a gut issue. Putting at the wrong speed is putting at the wrong speed. Although better than leaving one short, aggressively sending one by and "shrinking" the hole just slightly improves the odds.
Try playing a few rounds with "pull back" rules. Any putt from 30' and in that doesn't get past the lip of the hole gets pulled back 1 additional putter length. Any put that goes past the hole and past whatever comfort level you subscribe to (6", 12", 17", etc.) gets pulled back away from the hole 1 additional putter length. A couple rounds of this (especially with a few nickels riding on the outcome) will reveal which tendencies you have and from what putts.
Putting with good speed is a perishable skill.