As a teacher myself (albeit of English Literature to 13- 18 year olds; UK high school) I often wonder why some people seem to teach (whatever it is they teach) extremely well, while others are very poor. This seems - based purely on my personal experience - at least as true of golf professionals as it does of schoolteachers.
Initially I thought about knowledge: but then some academics I know are appalling teachers. Everything comes so easily to them they simply can't relate to those who find things harder. So while knowledge is important, it can't be the be-all and end-all.
Then I considered the ability to relate to one's student(s). Yet once again, my own finest teacher at school was a very odd man with an unhealthy obsession with bee-keeping. He was, however, a fantastic biology teacher.
My view - eventually arrived at- is that being a good teacher means:
I'd be interested to know what Brian and others think about this
Initially I thought about knowledge: but then some academics I know are appalling teachers. Everything comes so easily to them they simply can't relate to those who find things harder. So while knowledge is important, it can't be the be-all and end-all.
Then I considered the ability to relate to one's student(s). Yet once again, my own finest teacher at school was a very odd man with an unhealthy obsession with bee-keeping. He was, however, a fantastic biology teacher.
My view - eventually arrived at- is that being a good teacher means:
- Being able to identify a student's needs
- Having the knowledge to meet those needs
- Having the communication skills and flexibility to deploy that knowledge in way(s) that the student understands; and
- Always having an alternative available if your first teaching strategy fails
I'd be interested to know what Brian and others think about this