mjstrong
New
VSP Experts:
At first glance, it would seem that swinging more left would encourage a lower VSP post-impact. I'm picturing a David Toms type through-swing, that exits through or below his left shoulder. This seems to me like a low-VSP result.
But, we are hearing that a VSP that matches your club's lie angle may be more desirable, which would seem like a much higher through-swing look than the typical "swinging left" through swing look.
I hope that I am explaining myself clearly enough. For those VSP experts out there, can you help me balance these two concepts, and let me know where I might be going wrong?
I understand that the VSP is likely measured totally pre-impact, and therefore a player could theoretically have a 62 degree pre-impact VSP with a much lower VSP post-impact. If so, is this likely what happens with a lot of the elite players out there?
Thanks all.
At first glance, it would seem that swinging more left would encourage a lower VSP post-impact. I'm picturing a David Toms type through-swing, that exits through or below his left shoulder. This seems to me like a low-VSP result.
But, we are hearing that a VSP that matches your club's lie angle may be more desirable, which would seem like a much higher through-swing look than the typical "swinging left" through swing look.
I hope that I am explaining myself clearly enough. For those VSP experts out there, can you help me balance these two concepts, and let me know where I might be going wrong?
I understand that the VSP is likely measured totally pre-impact, and therefore a player could theoretically have a 62 degree pre-impact VSP with a much lower VSP post-impact. If so, is this likely what happens with a lot of the elite players out there?
Thanks all.