David Alford
New
Have you ever seen the video "In Pursuit of Perfection"? It was made by a guy who took home videos of Hogan's swing. Anyway, in the first part, he does his
own analysis of Hogan's swing. It's amazing, because almost everything he says seems remarkably astute. Quite a nice analysis. The only problem, it's an analysis of positions vs. what caused the positions. That's the problem here.
Position analysis can be helpful, it's better than not knowing what the positions are. But really, can't anyone look at Hogan's positions (above) and see the right elbow is straight or not straight, the left wrist arched or not arched, etc. etc.?
If I spilled my guts here, a lot of people would say, "oh, I knew that", etc.
I'm not so easily pleased. For me, if you know something, you should be able to demonstrate it. Maybe not as good as Hogan, but at least something reasonably close. Physical limitations, such as injury or advanced age would be valid exceptions.
Any good golf swing is simple. There's not a complex one out there that works. So, it logically follows, Hogan's is not complex either.
The simpler the better. But deriving the perfect simple forumula, is not so easy...millions have tried...the derivation is the hard part. Much harder than the execution. Please excuse me if I don't give away my years of hard work.
I will just say, Hogan's swing consists of a few modifications to a "traditional" swing formula. But, gee, it's so easy to be mislead and end up
doing something entirely wrong. And this is true even if one has read and reread Hogan's own books.
own analysis of Hogan's swing. It's amazing, because almost everything he says seems remarkably astute. Quite a nice analysis. The only problem, it's an analysis of positions vs. what caused the positions. That's the problem here.
Position analysis can be helpful, it's better than not knowing what the positions are. But really, can't anyone look at Hogan's positions (above) and see the right elbow is straight or not straight, the left wrist arched or not arched, etc. etc.?
If I spilled my guts here, a lot of people would say, "oh, I knew that", etc.
I'm not so easily pleased. For me, if you know something, you should be able to demonstrate it. Maybe not as good as Hogan, but at least something reasonably close. Physical limitations, such as injury or advanced age would be valid exceptions.
Any good golf swing is simple. There's not a complex one out there that works. So, it logically follows, Hogan's is not complex either.
The simpler the better. But deriving the perfect simple forumula, is not so easy...millions have tried...the derivation is the hard part. Much harder than the execution. Please excuse me if I don't give away my years of hard work.
I will just say, Hogan's swing consists of a few modifications to a "traditional" swing formula. But, gee, it's so easy to be mislead and end up
doing something entirely wrong. And this is true even if one has read and reread Hogan's own books.