"Bumpy Back" vs Diagonal Stance

Status
Not open for further replies.
[...]
I wish they were able to take a position on my next controversial 'hypothesis', that regarding the angular velocity of the hips, slower is better, for less injury, less dispersion, AND unbelievably (but test results are verifying), more club head velocity.

Regards,
art

Art - you might be pleasantly surprised.

Faldo really laboured the point about how he felt the left hip pull the lower body into the transition and downswing, against a resisting right side, knee and hip.

Price said this (and lots more in a similar vein) about the early downswing. "You must feel a slight sqatting or sitting onto the right knee...that slows the hip rotation momentarily and allows the hands to catch up." And also, "Working the hips too quickly is one of the many mistakes that golfers try to compensate for in the downswing."

One more comment from me. I'm really pleased to see the effort you are making to integrate the mechanical science with an Inner Game-inspired approach to learning. I'm convinced that real progress lies in that direction.
 

leon

New
Another vote for bumpy back from me. Tried it today and it felt a lot more stable. The only problem I found was that it felt such a more powerful position that I couldn't help going at the ball too hard. I'm sure I'll figure it out though.
 
Dear GeoffDickson,
That is a GREAT summary...
art

Nobody tell Art, but I cut and pasted that second statement from one of his earlier posts :)

I think that Sacto84's description of Bumpy Back is also nice and succinct: a pre-turned trail hip at setup
 
Last edited:

joep

New
Art, when you turn the right hip back were is the weight suppose to be, more on the right leg or left? It feels at times its on the left ,am I doing wrong?
 

art

New
Taking Arts’ advice, I’ve been doing range sessions with the driver using the pre-turned trail hip at setup concept. I’m surprised at the success I’m having with this setup. It took a couple of range sessions to adjust to the difference in feel from my normal setup, but once I became comfortable the shots improved dramatically: (1) I picked up an additional 15 yards carry with no feeling of additional effort in the DS. (2) more importantly the shot dispersion was reduced significantly, and (3) there was less stress on the lower back. Trackman indicated that on most shots I had picked up an average of 4.5 mph additional clubhead speed and occasionally more.

I can’t fully explain why this was occurring but I can say with certainty that my balance was better and I could swing faster into impact without fear of losing my positions. From the pre-turned hip position you can merely use the lower body (hips) to support the upper body rotation or you can choose to use the hips actively to add some force to the DS. In either case the pre-set of the trail hip seems to aid in the sequencing and timing of the DS; mostly I think because you can pre-set the trail hip to a position you like and not worry about trying to find that hip position in the BS from a regular setup position. The feeling is one of having a much freer swing with better balance.
One thing I’m still playing around with is the weight placement after pre-turning the trail hip. My best results came from pre-turning the trail hip into a firm trail leg and not shifting too much weight onto the trail foot during the BS, just a slight torque into the trail foot instep. At times there is a feeling of very little weight shift to the trail side and using a single post swing like the right side swing taught by Gary Irwin out of Australia.

I’ve only hit about 600 balls so it’s still a work in progress, but I like the concept enough to try it with the irons and experiment some more with weight shifting and some active use of the hip in the DS. For now I can say that the concept works for me.

Dear sacto84,

PERFECT SUMMARY, and some very valuable additional insight.

The science behind and supporting all of this is IMO compelling. Do you have a science background ??

This string, with your input make all of my 5 year journey for golf truth worth while.

My most sincere and gracious thanks for the feedback,
art
 
So you turn your hips clockwise at address correct? Nothing else.

What do you do with them at the start of the downswing? Slide? Rotate? Try not to rotate?

I'm gonna have my wife try this as she has really bad hip movement on the backswing...........REALLY bad. thanks
 

art

New
Art, when you turn the right hip back were is the weight suppose to be, more on the right leg or left? It feels at times its on the left ,am I doing wrong?

Dear joep,

When I talk about the complete integrated solution that lead to 'Bumpy back ..', it is honest to say that this evolved over several years, and during the work that ensued, it became clear to me that the NATURAL balancing of the body was taking charge of in this case weight distribution.

In other words, using a single force plate for guidance, it indicated for a variety of players and capabilities, that 50-50, 60-40, if 'dictated' did not work as well as letting the golfer just 'waggle their feet' WHAT??? Well, at least move them up and down, letting the body place them in a very slightly different location than where the golfer placed them when just starting the set up.

Further study revealed that the body always seeks the BEST/OPTIMUM way to accomplish a motion based task, and in this situation, I realized that these golfers, moving their feet, were becoming much more comfortable with their stance, especially with regard to their distance to the ball with varying clubs. Also, the distance and dispersion characteristics were better if the golfer and the movement of their feet determined the FINAL set-up position before the back swing. If for no other reason, they seemed more relaxed, but IMO there is much more to this capability we all have that involves proprioception etc.

So impressed with seeing the bodies ability to seek its best starting condition, i continued believing this was natural for many of the other complicated aspects required to play the whole game of golf, and now refer to the science-based process as BODIGolf, for Body Optimized by Dynamic Integration, for as I am sure you must realize by now, I believe that the bodies 'dynamics' controls the outcome of the quality of ALL golf shots, including putting.

So, in conclusion regarding your weight distribution question, I would just say (without proof at this time) that for your full swing, 'Bippy back,keep it back' AND for your best weight distribution, make sure your tailbone (coccyx) at least points straight down between your feet or slightly backward, but for sure do NOT let it point forward towards your lead leg.

The weight distribution that RESULTS is the best for you for this new set-up condition.

Please let all of us know how this works, or especially if it creates some problems for you.

Regards,
art
 
Further experimentation with the pre-turned hip: Using the Irons

A couple of extended range sessions with the irons confirmed the findings I had with the driver using the pre-turned hip at set-up: (1) increased clubhead speed and (2) lower dispersion. Iron distance across the board was increased by approximately 10 to 12 yards with a few considerably more.

I was more comfortable with this setup having experimented with the driver and I could get right into the swing mechanics and some further experimentation.

Here’s what seemed to work best for ME. I’m not saying the following is applicable for every golfer (one size does not fit all) and I think there is room for improvement as the experimentation continues.

I was pre-turning the trial hip into a braced trail leg so that I felt a clockwise torque on the inside of the trail foot. Seemed to work better that letting the trail leg float a little and felt nice and stable.

The pre-set hip came back about 3 to 4 inches from the normal setup except for the wedges which were less.

I let the lower body find its own weight distribution at setup for balance rather than pre-setting the weight at 50-50 or 60-40 etc. The result felt about 50-50 after the pre-turn of the hip but seemed to want to favor the lead foot once I torqued the trail hip against the trail foot a little. In the BS I had only a slight transfer of weight to the trail leg and no feeling of posting on that leg for a double post swing. (That’s not to say a double post won’t work for some golfers)

A word of caution here: When preforming the pre-turned hip action there is a tendency to also pre-turn the shoulders some. If this occurs there is a tendency to take the club back in the BS too far inside and get the resultant swing flaws (heel hits, etc). I won’t say that pre-turned shoulders is either good or bad at this point, but if you are pre-turning the shoulders some with the trail hip, be mindful of you hand path so they don’t come too far inside and/or get the clubhead behind the hands in the BS.

Numerous times I had the feeling of performing the Right Sided Swing and just rotating around a single post (left leg). It also felt somewhat like the ‘early hip return’ position supposedly performed by Hogan post-accident. In either case I again, like the driver, felt a freer DS and good rotation throughout the swing. Also felt the potential for a more powerful swing if I chose to use it; which I didn’t because I didn’t want another variable in the swing at this stage.

Impact tape indicated that I was getting as good or better center-face contact compared to my regular setup.

After two range sessions with about 500 balls I had no back issues so I’d suggest this setup is user friendly.
Next is to do a session or two with the idea of going for the fences with the driver and perhaps the irons to see how the balance holds up under those conditions and what my limitations are.

I’ve played single digit handicap golf for a lot of years and can say that so far this setup shows promise for further improvement while also being body friendly.
 
Hi Sac...what exactly does this mean?
"and no feeling of posting on that leg for a double post swing."

Never heard that terminology before.
 
Conkanen: Double Post: In the BS, transferring you weight to the trail leg and letting the trail hip turn around a posted trail leg, then shifting the weight to the lead side via a bump or slide and then in the DS swinging around a posted lead leg. An extreme example of this was Mike Austin who used what he called a compound pivot with the above mechanics. Many of the old timers who raised the left foot radically in the BS were likely double posters. One of Golf Digest's top 100 instructors uses this single post, double post terminology.
 

art

New
Further experimentation with the pre-turned hip: Using the Irons

A couple of extended range sessions with the irons confirmed the findings I had with the driver using the pre-turned hip at set-up: (1) increased clubhead speed and (2) lower dispersion. Iron distance across the board was increased by approximately 10 to 12 yards with a few considerably more.

I was more comfortable with this setup having experimented with the driver and I could get right into the swing mechanics and some further experimentation.

Here’s what seemed to work best for ME. I’m not saying the following is applicable for every golfer (one size does not fit all) and I think there is room for improvement as the experimentation continues.

I was pre-turning the trial hip into a braced trail leg so that I felt a clockwise torque on the inside of the trail foot. Seemed to work better that letting the trail leg float a little and felt nice and stable.

The pre-set hip came back about 3 to 4 inches from the normal setup except for the wedges which were less.

I let the lower body find its own weight distribution at setup for balance rather than pre-setting the weight at 50-50 or 60-40 etc. The result felt about 50-50 after the pre-turn of the hip but seemed to want to favor the lead foot once I torqued the trail hip against the trail foot a little. In the BS I had only a slight transfer of weight to the trail leg and no feeling of posting on that leg for a double post swing. (That’s not to say a double post won’t work for some golfers)

A word of caution here: When preforming the pre-turned hip action there is a tendency to also pre-turn the shoulders some. If this occurs there is a tendency to take the club back in the BS too far inside and get the resultant swing flaws (heel hits, etc). I won’t say that pre-turned shoulders is either good or bad at this point, but if you are pre-turning the shoulders some with the trail hip, be mindful of you hand path so they don’t come too far inside and/or get the clubhead behind the hands in the BS.

Numerous times I had the feeling of performing the Right Sided Swing and just rotating around a single post (left leg). It also felt somewhat like the ‘early hip return’ position supposedly performed by Hogan post-accident. In either case I again, like the driver, felt a freer DS and good rotation throughout the swing. Also felt the potential for a more powerful swing if I chose to use it; which I didn’t because I didn’t want another variable in the swing at this stage.

Impact tape indicated that I was getting as good or better center-face contact compared to my regular setup.

After two range sessions with about 500 balls I had no back issues so I’d suggest this setup is user friendly.
Next is to do a session or two with the idea of going for the fences with the driver and perhaps the irons to see how the balance holds up under those conditions and what my limitations are.

I’ve played single digit handicap golf for a lot of years and can say that so far this setup shows promise for further improvement while also being body friendly.



Dear sacto84,

Thanks for the 'right on' detail of your experiences with 'Bumpy back'. I especially liked your emphasizing the 'keep it back' process, including the feeling with the right foot on the ground.

As for your next test of increased energy/distance, be prepared to bend your knees a bit more, an inch at a time if your dynamic stability is reduced, and the dispersion increases from what you have already established.

If you have access to a launch monitor, I would appreciate having examples of the 'before and after' with a few clubs, especially the driver. Also, please take a look at my recent post #11 on "Thread: An honest question for all professional teachers" so you can start to track your improvement with a combined distance/dispersion I believe will be good for the professional golf instruction folks.

Regarding your discussion of posting, one or both legs, I am always appreciative of references to accomplished golfers such as Hogan, Nick Faldo etc, but personally put them in the 'exceptional talent AND trial and error, too much practice required category. What you are experimenting with, or are feeling from the 'Bumpy back experiences, is based on hypotheses using sound dynamic balance and stability principles, and soon, with help from the momentum of this wonderful media, we will be able to turn hypotheses and experiments and positive results like yours into much needed 'golf truths', my passion, and dream.

To that end, I will offer one more suggestion to your experimenting, so you don't get caught in a lengthy 'trial and error' loop.

This has to do with the hips, pelvis and rotation during the down swing.

Considering large centripetal force imbalances that would lead into lower body INSTABILITIES' it is great to read, that during your tests, your lead hip rotated counterclockwise FIRST, as the trail hip more slowly kind of pulled out of the Bumpy back position. This first move of the downswing, so far only analytically determined, ADDS lower body stability margin allowing the upper body to operate more energetically.

In a somewhat complicated way using 'instantaneous screw axis theories', this rotating lead hip is followed by the trail hip rotation AFTER THE PEAKS OF THE KINEMATIC SEQUENCE, and maybe as late as impact. This lead hip first, trail hip next rotation sequence should just be a smooth flow, not a numerically sequenced event, and I predict it will simply flow from your keeping the trail hip back as you have described so very clearly.

Please let us all know how the next phase of your much appreciated test program works out.

Very sincerely,
art.
 
Art: Are you saying that the unwinding of the hips is made in a helical motion? Sort of a double helix movement? Do date I've tried to keep a quiet lower body except to the extent the hips and legs support the upper body rotation. That will change in the next range session to see to what extent I can actively use the hips to support swing speed (or not). Thanks for the suggestions above
 

art

New
Art: Are you saying that the unwinding of the hips is made in a helical motion? Sort of a double helix movement? Do date I've tried to keep a quiet lower body except to the extent the hips and legs support the upper body rotation. That will change in the next range session to see to what extent I can actively use the hips to support swing speed (or not). Thanks for the suggestions above[/QUOTE

Dear satco84,

I have always been attracted and tempted to use the double helix as a descriptor for the entire down swing, as it is the basis of tmy rying to understand DNA, and I love that association.

If you can keep that in mind BEFORE THE DOWNSWING, I would love you to describe the motion of your left hip as ascending UP one side of the double helix, while pulling the right hip out of the 'Bumpy back, keep it back' position.

Because of the possible complexities of communicating what the double helix looks like AND MORE IMPORTANTLY the fact that the BEST path for the right hip is to follow a DESCENDING helix at the same time, I suppressed my scientific exactness in favor of the simple instruction, you know, 'Bumpy B....etc

Please let me know if your association with the double helix, and the above explanation made you perform better than just the simple explanation.

Regards,
art
 

art

New
So, left hip goes up as it turns in the backswing?

Dear cnadon,

No, the left (lead) hip goes slightly DOWN and clockwise during the back swing, then from its approximate 45 degree 'closed' position at the top of the back swing, reverses and goes slightly UP (the helix if that is your choice of reference) and counter clockwise thru impact, and on to the finish.

Hope this clarifies any confusion I may have caused in an earlier post.

Regards,
art
 
Dear cnadon,

No, the left (lead) hip goes slightly DOWN and clockwise during the back swing, then from its approximate 45 degree 'closed' position at the top of the back swing, reverses and goes slightly UP (the helix if that is your choice of reference) and counter clockwise thru impact, and on to the finish.

Hope this clarifies any confusion I may have caused in an earlier post.

Regards,
art

Got it. I thought maybe your were offering another new take on the backswing. Thanks.
 
ART: Some further experimentation with the pre-turned trail hip. I apologize in advance for a long post. As I said previously, using this set-up provided more distance and less dispersion; mainly I think because if I set the trail hip and kept it back until later in the DS I had a freer swing (better pivot) and the rotational speed picked up without the fear of losing balance. I could also set the trail hip where I wanted it instead of trying to find that position in each swing from a regular set-up. Dynamic balance was much improved and consistent unless I over accelerated in the DS and would override the levers.

You wanted a description of the lead hip action so I’ll provide first what worked best FOR ME (not to say it will work best for everyone). (Unfortunately I was not able to get on Trackman so the numbers will have to wait until a later date):

No. 1 - From a reverse K setup I pulled the trail hip back about 4 inches with all irons except the wedges. The trail hip moved back into a braced trail leg with a slightly flared rear foot. I do not shift weight to the trail side except to the extent I feel a slight clockwise torque in the trail foot. To accommodate the trail hip moving back I allow the lead knee to flex a little toward the lead foot so as to not sway toward the trail side.

In the BS I try to perform a helical twist of the spine to get a full shoulder turn while turning into the pre-set trail hip. No slide of the hips. At the top of the BS I feel a weight distribution of about 50-50 but more torque against the braced trail leg. The lead hip has turned more to the rear and slightly downward.

I start the DS by pressing down with the lead foot and doing an ever so slight squat as the arms begin to drop (yes, I do a back-toss type move with the hands and use a throwing motion in the swing).

At the start of the DS I resist with the lead hip against the tendency to immediately open that hip. Then later in the DS I move the lead hip from low to high and back using what I feel is a helical movement; no slide. I keep the trail hip back as the DS starts and don’t release it until I make the lead hip move. This is not difficult to time once you give it some practice. Nice free rotation and excellent balance. I’ll take the additional 15 yards it’s providing but far more importantly I like the reduction in dispersion that results. Easier to hold the spine angles and keep the butt back in the DS. No goat-humping moves

No. 2 - Second best was performing the above mechanics but late in the DS I would use a thrust of the trail hip from about 4 o’clock to 10 o’clock. This is along the lines of what Austin taught and is featured in the May issue of Golf Magazine on Rory Mcllroys’ power move with the hips. Yes, I was able to add yards, perhaps an average of 12 over #1, but the dispersion increased dramatically. Probably because I’m not used to swinging this way, or because I’m not doing it properly. Had a few goat-humping moves when I used the trail hip too soon in the DS. (This holds promise for future experimentation)

No. 3- Third best was doing the above but this time I moved the spine a little more rearward and loaded more weight on the trail leg in the BS. Almost a double post type of swing. I also cranked the trail hip deeper in the pre-set. This set-up necessitated some slide with the hips in the DS to get back to center and a different timing of the release of the lead hip. Had a few shots that went additional 7 or 8 yards over #2 but the dispersion was totally unacceptable. Not much consistency. Again, either I’m not familiar with the timing or I’m performing the mechanics improperly or out of sequence.

There are other adjustments I fooled around with such as an open or closed stance, a steeper or flatter angle of approach, and a regular centered set-up, but didn’t hit enough with these adjustments to be able to establish a trend .

Distance wise with the No. 1 swing, the sand wedge went from a regular 105 yards to 115-118 with the same effort I usually use. Eight iron went from 155 to a steady 168 on average, more if I used No. 2 (but not as accurate). I did bust one with the eight iron that went 175 but I'm not sure why and could not repeat it. Five iron went from 185-190 to a steady 200 to 210 for many hits but dropped back down to 185-190 when I somehow lost the sequencing. I’m the master of over acceleration so that may be the culprit.

In experimenting with this set-up on the range I purpously got aggressive with my swing to see what I could get out of that type of set-up and swing. On the course I suspect I would naturally be less inclined to be that aggressive and trend toward more conservative play. I will take it to the course next week and see how things pan out either way.

I think your “Bumpy Back, Keep It Back” hypothesis has merit judging from the short time I’ve experimented with it, and will report further if I have something worth contributing. Would appreciate hearing from any others that have had some success with this set-up.

Any further suggestions you may have regarding this hypothesis are welcome. I’ll give them an honest go. Any questions, go ahead and ask.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top