Craig "sizzle" Stadler Pros and Cons
- Thread starter corky05
- Start date
- Status
self-mastery
New
Does he use the same technique for every club (driver, fw, SG)? I ask because 2 years ago I was using a similar technique with much success with my irons, but struggle with my driver. I'm thinking about ressurecting this swing with the knowledge I gain from this forum.
self,
He uses the same swing for all clubs. I followed him in a charity event in the mid-eighties. At a long dog-leg left par 5, he teed it up addressed the ball, backed off, walked toward the gallery and asked if anyone would be willing to hit the drive for him. He cannot hit a draw, and only occasionally is able to hit it straight. So, even some of the top players have to compromise.
Sam Snead's advice to a rookie pro - "Son, you'll either have a swing that works good for the irons or for the woods, but not both".
Most pros look for their best iron swing, and make it work for the woods.
He uses the same swing for all clubs. I followed him in a charity event in the mid-eighties. At a long dog-leg left par 5, he teed it up addressed the ball, backed off, walked toward the gallery and asked if anyone would be willing to hit the drive for him. He cannot hit a draw, and only occasionally is able to hit it straight. So, even some of the top players have to compromise.
Sam Snead's advice to a rookie pro - "Son, you'll either have a swing that works good for the irons or for the woods, but not both".
Most pros look for their best iron swing, and make it work for the woods.
self-mastery
New
Thank you mizuno. Why can't Stadler hit a draw?
Sounds good to me ... and again just proves that TGM should not be used on a scientific basis to analyze the golfswing. Stick with what you know and understand and leave the science to the scientists ... even those who don't fully understand nor appreciate the intricacies of the golfswing, as Homer did ... but unfortunately wanted to be a scientist too ... and failed miserably ... go figure ....[V]
So basically you're saying the yellow book is great for everyone except scientists. You've made this point numerous times about how difficult the yellow book would be for the scientists who would like to pick up the game. Is that a huge market? Would that be a practical reason for a rewrite? You have requested a rewrite, at what expense, and how many of these rogue science golfers are there to incur the cost of this rewrite? And, you have mentioned that, other than this small faction of science golfers the book seems to be quite servicable.
I've got a suggestion! Quit your sniveling!
I've got a suggestion! Quit your sniveling!
self-mastery
New
Should I model Stad's swing? I tried a Stad-like stroke today with success, his method is such an easier way to hit a golf ball, my 4 iron was flying 210.
self,
Whether you use some of his swing ideas or not, DO NOT emulate his sorry attitude on the golf course. He's always disatisfied with his shot - I've seen him hit a mid-iron approach within 12 feet and throw his club at the bag in disgust. If you follow him for only 2-3 holes, you'll have acid indigestion.
Whether you use some of his swing ideas or not, DO NOT emulate his sorry attitude on the golf course. He's always disatisfied with his shot - I've seen him hit a mid-iron approach within 12 feet and throw his club at the bag in disgust. If you follow him for only 2-3 holes, you'll have acid indigestion.
self-mastery
New
Mizuno,
i'm guilty of lossing my temper on the course. I'm working on playing (both life/ golf) with a certain amount of indifference. Smile therepy.
i'm guilty of lossing my temper on the course. I'm working on playing (both life/ golf) with a certain amount of indifference. Smile therepy.
- Status